2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain size effect on tensile deformation behaviors of pure aluminum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultimate compressive strength (CUS) value of the modified alloy reached 510 MPa at room temperature. These results are in agreement with (Kurt et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2021), which attributed to the refining effect of the TiB. As shown in Figures 13B, the CUS of this modified alloy had a greater value than that of the conventional A242 alloys used in manufacturing automobile component parts.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The ultimate compressive strength (CUS) value of the modified alloy reached 510 MPa at room temperature. These results are in agreement with (Kurt et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2021), which attributed to the refining effect of the TiB. As shown in Figures 13B, the CUS of this modified alloy had a greater value than that of the conventional A242 alloys used in manufacturing automobile component parts.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The strengthening mechanisms of titanium alloys can be broadly categorized into: solution strengthening, second-phase strengthening, α-phase lattice strengthening, finegrain strengthening, texture strengthening, etc. [36,37]. As mentioned above, in this study, the factors that led to changes in the mechanical properties of the alloy mainly include the initial dislocation density, the size effect of αs, and nano-β.…”
Section: Effect Of Microstructure Evolution On Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…On the other hand, the mentioned two changed parameters have an effect on the A in TD and Ea values. The decrease in hot rolling temperature helped by producing the average of the smaller crystal grains, but at the same time, the increase in the share of deformed and substructured grains has the greater influence on the reduction in A values in TD [28,29]. The decrease in recrystallized grains with the smaller HRB final thickness also has a contribution to the higher anisotropy shown by Ea values [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%