“…The increased coercive field of the misaligned model structure (Figure 12), compared to the aligned one, is in good agreement with the measured data. The small discrepancy between the measured and simulated coercive fields can be attributed to the uniform size of distribution grains [40,41] and GBs and other microstructural features, which were not taken into account in the simulated model structure, for example, soft magnetic inclusions in the grains, which can act as a nucleation site for reversed magnetic domains [42], and a reduction of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the hard magnetic grains near intergranular phases as a molecular dynamic study revealed [27,43].…”