2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4904854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain-size dependent demagnetizing factors in permanent magnets

Abstract: The coercive field of permanent magnets decreases with increasing grain size. The grain size dependence of coercivity is explained by a size dependent demagnetizing factor. In Dy free Nd$_2$Fe$_{14}$B magnets the size dependent demagnetizing factor ranges from 0.2 for a grain size of 55 nm to 1.22 for a grain size of 8300 nm. The comparison of experimental data with micromagnetic simulations suggests that the grain size dependence of the coercive field in hard magnets is due to the non-uniform magnetostatic fi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased coercive field of the misaligned model structure (Figure 12), compared to the aligned one, is in good agreement with the measured data. The small discrepancy between the measured and simulated coercive fields can be attributed to the uniform size of distribution grains [40,41] and GBs and other microstructural features, which were not taken into account in the simulated model structure, for example, soft magnetic inclusions in the grains, which can act as a nucleation site for reversed magnetic domains [42], and a reduction of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the hard magnetic grains near intergranular phases as a molecular dynamic study revealed [27,43].…”
Section: Micromagnetic Simulations Of the Influence Of The Gbmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The increased coercive field of the misaligned model structure (Figure 12), compared to the aligned one, is in good agreement with the measured data. The small discrepancy between the measured and simulated coercive fields can be attributed to the uniform size of distribution grains [40,41] and GBs and other microstructural features, which were not taken into account in the simulated model structure, for example, soft magnetic inclusions in the grains, which can act as a nucleation site for reversed magnetic domains [42], and a reduction of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the hard magnetic grains near intergranular phases as a molecular dynamic study revealed [27,43].…”
Section: Micromagnetic Simulations Of the Influence Of The Gbmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The reduction in coercivity due to grain shape was recently investigated by Bance at al. [36], where it was shown that, for a 50 nm grain diameter, an aligned cubic grain has a 0.85 reduction in coercivity with respect to a dodecahedral grain shape. Additionally, grain easy axis misalignment reduces coercivity in real magnets.…”
Section: Grain Boundary Diffused Magnetic Grainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation is to explore the possible role of the place where strain/stress appears and the associated micromagnetic mechanism. The grain shape effects have been recently investigated for achieving high coercivity [53][54][55][56]. Here we considered four types of prism grains with triangular, rectangular, hexagonal, and circular sections.…”
Section: Single-grain Nd-fe-b Magnetsmentioning
confidence: 99%