1974
DOI: 10.1179/cmq.1974.13.1.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain growth in zone-refined iron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained with the size distribution in 2-D sections of zonerefined iron. [6] It is seen in Figure 6(b) that the face number distribution is unlikely to be log-normal, either.…”
Section: Distribution Of Grain Volume and Surface Areamentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results were obtained with the size distribution in 2-D sections of zonerefined iron. [6] It is seen in Figure 6(b) that the face number distribution is unlikely to be log-normal, either.…”
Section: Distribution Of Grain Volume and Surface Areamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Hillert [20] applied the theory of Ostwald ripening to grain growth and obtained the size distribution function [6] where u ϭ R/R cr and R cr is related to ϽRϾ as ϽRϾ ϭ 8R cr /9. The term A is a constant and ␤ ϭ 3 for grain growth in three dimensions.…”
Section: Distribution Of Grain Volume and Surface Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both experiments and simulations have shown that grain growth follows power-law kinetics and their grain size distribution (GSD) can be described by a log-normal distribution [4][5][6][7]. In the early 1950s, Lifshitz and Slyozov [8] proposed a theoretical framework to model grain growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (1) can be written formally where m is the mobility. The conceptual division of the velocity into a mobility (of the boundary) and a driving force acting on the boundary according t o (2), which is almost always made in the analysis of experimental data [9], implies that m and p are independent variables of the existing system. Since, however, both quantities depend on the structural characteristics of the system (lattice CY -grain boundary -lattice P ) this independence is to be expected theoretically only in very special cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%