2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.04.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain boundary energy and curvature in Monte Carlo and cellular automata simulations of grain boundary motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most work, H is assumed to be the inverse of the mean spherical equivalent grain radius. With the emergence of three-dimensional microscopic techniques and simulations, it has become possible to locally measure curvature within voxelized microstructures [10][11][12][13][14][15] and a technique that can be used to measure local grain boundary curvature and correlate it to the crystallography of the grain boundary has recently been reported. 16 The method has been applied to two ferrous alloys and it was found that the curvature varies strongly as a function of the grain boundary plane orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most work, H is assumed to be the inverse of the mean spherical equivalent grain radius. With the emergence of three-dimensional microscopic techniques and simulations, it has become possible to locally measure curvature within voxelized microstructures [10][11][12][13][14][15] and a technique that can be used to measure local grain boundary curvature and correlate it to the crystallography of the grain boundary has recently been reported. 16 The method has been applied to two ferrous alloys and it was found that the curvature varies strongly as a function of the grain boundary plane orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Monte Carlo models simulate curvature-driven grain boundary motion by the random movement of kinks (2D) or ledges (3D) along the grain boundaries controlled by the transition rules. Due to the calculations of grain boundary curvature and energy are ambiguous and the transition rules governing the change of voxel state are often not physically justified, the physical meaning of units of length, time and energy in Monte Carlo models is often unspecified [147]. Nonetheless, the numerical implementation is straightforward and decent computational efficiency can be achieved in the Monte Carlo models, especially since the algorithm is very suitable for parallelization, the Monte Carlo models are still frequently used to model the complex microstructure evolution in materials.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] However, the experimental study of grain growth is severely limited by the high temperatures at which it occurs and the optical opacity of polycrystalline samples. Therefore, to systematically examine grain growth phenomena, numerical approaches have been developed using continuum-based grain growth models, 4) including the Monte-Carlo, [5][6][7][8] cellular automaton, [8][9][10][11] vertex or front-tracking, [12][13][14][15][16][17] surface evolver, [18][19][20] and phase-field 7,[21][22][23][24][25][26] models. In particular, the phase-field method has become common because it can accurately address curvature-driven grain boundary migration without explicit boundary tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%