2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grafting carbon nanotubes directly onto carbon fibers for superior mechanical stability: Towards next generation aerospace composites and energy storage applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…dispersion of CNTs in the electrospun polymeric solution 14 or physically grafting CNTs onto the surface of CNFs. 17 CVD processes that have been used to grow CNTs on CNFs include a floating catalyst approach, 18 grafting the catalyst by simply dipping CNFs into the solution containing the catalyst, 19 and encapsulating the catalyst nanoparticles into the CNFs by electrospinning. 20,21 Among these methods, the floating catalyst approach is considered to be the most convenient and size-controllable processing route to make CNF/CNTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dispersion of CNTs in the electrospun polymeric solution 14 or physically grafting CNTs onto the surface of CNFs. 17 CVD processes that have been used to grow CNTs on CNFs include a floating catalyst approach, 18 grafting the catalyst by simply dipping CNFs into the solution containing the catalyst, 19 and encapsulating the catalyst nanoparticles into the CNFs by electrospinning. 20,21 Among these methods, the floating catalyst approach is considered to be the most convenient and size-controllable processing route to make CNF/CNTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simplify the process, a unique acid oxidation treatment was performed on both CFs and CNTs, then they were bound by coupling agents like dendrimers and PAMAM [19,20]. This approach avoids the double functionalization but leads to a lower grafting density due to the steric hindrance induced by the coupling agent [21]. More recent approaches are based on the oxidation of the carbon-based species followed by an esterification reaction, thus leading to higher grafting density [22,23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen, the CNT‐OH had a diffraction peak value at 2 θ = 26.4°, whereas the peak of CF‐COOH become weaker and wider (about 25°) because of decreasing graphite crystal after oxidation. After chemical reaction between CNT‐OH and CF‐COOH, the diffraction peak of CF–CNTs hybrids increased to 27.6°, indicating ordered graphite structure after chemical grafting …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%