2012
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.239
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graft failure in the modern era of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
165
1
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
8
165
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this study allogeneic SCT had been performed for multiple (hematologic and non-hematologic) indications and only a small number of MF patients was included (n = 21). 26 Other indirect support for our hypothesis stems from the reports by Kröger et al They used a RIC regimen, incorporating fludarabine, busulfan and ATG, and reached the lowest graft failure rates reported to date (2-5%). 12,27 In contrast, Ballen et al Abbreviations: cy = cyclophosphamide; DIPSS = Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System; Flu = fludarabine; JAK2 = Janus kinase 2; Mel = melphalan; MSD = matched sibling donor; NMA = non-myeloablative; PTS = predictive transplant score; RIC = reduced-intensity conditioning; SCT = stem cell transplantation; TRM = treatment-related mortality; UD = unrelated donor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, in this study allogeneic SCT had been performed for multiple (hematologic and non-hematologic) indications and only a small number of MF patients was included (n = 21). 26 Other indirect support for our hypothesis stems from the reports by Kröger et al They used a RIC regimen, incorporating fludarabine, busulfan and ATG, and reached the lowest graft failure rates reported to date (2-5%). 12,27 In contrast, Ballen et al Abbreviations: cy = cyclophosphamide; DIPSS = Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System; Flu = fludarabine; JAK2 = Janus kinase 2; Mel = melphalan; MSD = matched sibling donor; NMA = non-myeloablative; PTS = predictive transplant score; RIC = reduced-intensity conditioning; SCT = stem cell transplantation; TRM = treatment-related mortality; UD = unrelated donor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Within this subgroup, 25-OH-D 3 levels were not significantly associated with other known risk factors for rejection, anti-T-cell treatment, HLA mismatch or non-malignant disease. 22 Low 25-OH-D 3 levels were more common among patients receiving cord blood transplants, but removing these patients from the analysis did not change the result.…”
Section: Vitamin D Deficiency and Complications After Hsct L Von Bahrmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As 11 out of 13 cases of graft failure were in patients having received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), and RIC has previously been shown to be a risk factor for graft failure, 22 we chose this subgroup for a post hoc analysis (Figure 4). Abbreviations: cGvHD = chronic GvHD; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazards ratio.…”
Section: Survival and Relapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have reported that the overall incidence of GF after CBT is between 10% and 20% 3, 4, 5. GF can be due to immunological rejection of donor cells by residual host lymphocytes, the presence of donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA), or nonimmunologic mechanisms such as poor stem cell viability and viral infections 6, 7. Particularly, factors associated with GF in CBT can be inherently low stem cell doses, HLA mismatch, relative immaturity of CB lymphocytes and the increasing use of reduced intensity conditioning with CBT 4, 8, 9.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%