2017
DOI: 10.1177/0363546517704177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graft Diameter as a Predictor for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D Values: A Cohort Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register Based on 2240 Patients

Abstract: In a large cohort of patients after primary ACLR with HT autografts, an increase in the graft diameter between 7.0 and 10.0 mm resulted in a 0.86 times lower likelihood of revision surgery with every 0.5-mm increase. This study provides further evidence of the importance of the HT autograft size in intraoperative decision making.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
152
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
152
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study,11 graft diameter was not associated with the incidence of revision ACL reconstruction. In a matched case-control study (with patients who went on to revision ACL reconstruction),23 the likelihood of revision ACL reconstruction was 14% lower for every 0.5 mm increment in graft diameter from 7.0 to 10.0 mm (OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.75 to 0.99], p=0.03).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study,11 graft diameter was not associated with the incidence of revision ACL reconstruction. In a matched case-control study (with patients who went on to revision ACL reconstruction),23 the likelihood of revision ACL reconstruction was 14% lower for every 0.5 mm increment in graft diameter from 7.0 to 10.0 mm (OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.75 to 0.99], p=0.03).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the results by Snaebjörnsson et al from the Swedish registry did not parallel these findings. 18 In their patient-reported outcomes, measured through the KOOS and EQ-5D questionnaires, there was no demonstrable correlation between increased graft size and patient-reported outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…17 The recent cohort study by Snaebjörnsson et al based on the Swedish knee ligament register similarly reported a 0.86 times lower likelihood of revision with every 0.5-mm increment in graft diameter in graft sizes between 7 and 10 mm. 18 Larger graft sizes have also been reported to produce better patient-reported outcomes. 1,9,10 The Multicentre Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort study of 263 patients described an association between larger hamstring graft diameters and better patient-reported outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australia has reported the highest incidence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in the world (Zbrojkiewicz et al, ), where hamstring autograft harvesting continues to be the preferred technique for graft reconstruction (Lee et al, ). Although risk of re‐rupture or clinical failure of ACLR is multifactorial, an inverse relationship between graft size and revision risk has been identified from observational analyses (Conte et al, ; Snaebjörnsson et al, ). However, the desire to implant the maximal autograft diameter (Park et al, ) imposes a risk of impingement and associated complications, particularly in younger patients (Su et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%