2004
DOI: 10.1080/00049670.2004.10721622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graduate information literacy skills: the 2003 ANU skills audit

Abstract: This article looks at the information literacy (ILS) skills of graduate students and is based on an audit at the ANU in 2003 which included database searching, web searching, information management and word processing skills-vital to all graduate students. Each student who completed the audit received a 'training needs profile'. Staff also benefited as they had a better understanding of the skills of the students that they were providing training for.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example Perrett (2004) recommended information search training to 59 percent of students assessed. One study found that the most common difficulties students had in finding information was choosing keywords and refining searches and sorting through masses of information to find relevant resources (Hoffmann et al, 2008).…”
Section: Disciplinary Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example Perrett (2004) recommended information search training to 59 percent of students assessed. One study found that the most common difficulties students had in finding information was choosing keywords and refining searches and sorting through masses of information to find relevant resources (Hoffmann et al, 2008).…”
Section: Disciplinary Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a few studies have included basic skills assessment of postgraduates (Samson, 2000;Emmett & Emde, 2007;Perrett, 2004) or have declared that their tests could be used for longitudinal testing (Kent State University, 2010; Leibiger & Schweinle, 2008: 91), no studies specifically attempting to compare the skill levels of undergraduate and postgraduate students have been located in the literature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported never using Boolean operators and 28% used them seldom. Perrett's (2004) audit of Australian graduate students found less than half (49%) had a firm understanding of how to search databases using Boolean operators. Mehrad and Rahimi (2012) found for a range of search skills, students at both the MA and PhD level, performed lowest on Boolean and synonyms and suitable keywords.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%