Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study

Abstract

BackgroundIncorporating graduate students into undergraduate medical degree programs is a commonly accepted practice. However, it has only recently been recognized that these two types of students cope with their studies in various ways. The aim was to compare the learning approaches, stress levels and ways of coping of undergraduate (UG) and graduate entry medical students (GEMP) throughout their medical course.MethodsFrom 2007–2011 each of the five year cohorts of undergraduate and GEMP students completed four components of the study. The components included demographics, The Biggs’ R-SPQ-2 F questionnaire which determines students’ approaches to learning, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) used to rate students perceived stress during the past four weeks, and the Ways of Coping (WOC) questionnaire used to assess students’ methods of coping with everyday problems.ResultsThere was a consistent difference between UG and GEMP students approaches to learning over the five years. GEMP students preferred a deep approach while the UG students preferred a superficial approach to learning. This difference became more obvious in the clinical years. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in stress levels. There were consistent differences in the ways the two groups coped with stress.ConclusionsThere were significant differences in approaches to learning and ways of coping with stress between the UG and the GEMP students. These need to be considered when introducing curriculum change, in particular, redesigning an UG program for post graduate delivery.

Relevance of anatomy to medical education and clinical practice: perspectives of medical students, clinicians, and educators

“…In agreement with previous studies, which have shown differences in both motivational variables and approaches to learning in GEM vs . DEM (e. g. Sandover et al) [9], this study has also demonstrated differences between both student groups in relation to preferred mode of instruction and perceived relationship between anatomy and clinical education.…”

“…Significant differences across motivational variables as well as approaches to learning have been identified between DEM and GEM students (e. g. Sandover et al.) [9]. As the nature of medical training and academic clinical training pathways continue to evolve, it is important that the learning requirements and educational preferences of graduate entrants are also evaluated.…”

The transition to self‐regulated learning for first‐year dental students: threshold concepts

“…The lack of a textbook was clearly a concern and a source of confusion for these students. This finding is not unique; other studies conducted with beginning Medical and Oral Hygiene students have highlighted the same concern . It could be argued that understanding the difference between absorbing a single ‘truth’ from a textbook and being able to accommodate slightly different information on the same topic from a range of sources is a threshold concept.…”

International medical students’ adaptation to university life in Turkey

“…However, if the student's coping strategies are not sufficient, adaptation to the new culture would be more difficult. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The disease-health patterns of different countries affect the content of medical education programs, their languages, and the type of communication between doctor and patient. The undergraduate medical education programs have a different character compared to other college programs in this regard.…”