Graduate Design Education: The Case for an Accretive Model

Abstract

In 2008 the University of Melbourne began implementation of the Melbourne Model, its new vision for higher education in Australia. Six broad undergraduate university degrees have been introduced and graduate schools created. Students may now progress from an undergraduate generalist degree, with major, to a professional Masters. Alternatively, graduate lateral entry is available for students to pursue a professional qualification without prior preparation. This acceleration has significant implications for design studio teaching. Students with no design background but with an undergraduate degree are now able to study architecture or landscape architecture in just three years, compared to the previous four‐to six‐year undergraduate degrees. This article reviews and analyses the outcomes of an ‘accretive’ design studio (Christie 2002) devised for beginning Masters students which attempts to translate a new mandate of ‘acceleration’ into design pedagogy. Analysis of student focus groups, together with the work produced, revealed not only the value of the accretive model in delivering a cohesive understanding of the design process and a student engagement that exceeds the outcomes of traditional design studio but also highlights the value of an immediate immersion into a community of practice (Lave & Wenger, 1991). We argue that immersion, as distinct from conventional educational models which position education as ‘training’ for a future participation in a discipline, is central to any acceleration model, serving to position students as active definers of the discipline rather than passive observers and thereby increasing ownership of their learning experience.

The Case for Inclusion of International Planning Studios in Contemporary Urban Planning Pedagogy

“…In this context, the offshore learning experience enables students to unpack the differences in "planning cultures" and share diverse perspectives, including understanding varying development interests, stakeholder motivations, and the nature of local circumsatnces and contexts [26]. As observed elsewhere, international studios provide a valuable immersion experience for students that can result in improved learning outcomes [30]. Despite the limited use of planning studios in Australia, they have been validated by planning practitioners as an important teaching strategy when educating planning students [12].…”

‘The answer is brought about from within you’: A Student‐Centred Perspective on Pedagogy in Art and Design

“…The students offer a convincing portrayal of the key characteristics of a creative education. They have been immersed in a studio environment for three years and their narratives point to a strong level of enculturation (Walliss & Greig 2009). In this section we reflect on the findings and explore the role of the lecturer, the content of art and design education and we propose an emergent theory of students' learning.…”

Producing Design: Which Way?

“…So far, the twenty-first century has kept up with the modern mania toward training design students to "be creative" in dealing with their learning careers and taking care of their issues (Teixeira, 2010). Schools and universities are doing away with the conventional emphasis on rationality as a mental excellence standard, endeavoring to include more creativity in their educational programs (Smith 2003;Walliss, 2009).…”