2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1011361108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradual disintegration of the floral symmetry gene network is implicated in the evolution of a wind-pollination syndrome

Abstract: Angiosperms exhibit staggering diversity in floral form, and evolution of floral morphology is often correlated with changes in pollination syndrome. The showy, bilaterally symmetrical flowers of the model species Antirrhinum majus (Plantaginaceae) are highly specialized for bee pollination. In A. majus, CYCLOIDEA (CYC), DICHOTOMA (DICH), RADIALIS (RAD), and DIVARICATA (DIV) specify the development of floral bilateral symmetry. However, it is unclear to what extent evolution of these genes has resulted in flow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Plantago, Tengia, Cadia and Microsteria, one CYC-like paralogue (or set of closely related paralogues in the case of Tengia) is expressed across the dorsoventral flower axis, owing to regulatory evolution either at or upstream of that paralogue. The other CYC-like paralogue has been lost (Plantago and Microsteria), or is no longer expressed in flowers (Cadia and Tengia) [80][81][82][83]. Alternatively, both CYC-like paralogues are expressed across the dorsoventral flower axis (Psychopterys), or neither is expressed in flowers (Sphedamnocarpus) [82].…”
Section: Evolutionary Transitions From Bilateral To Radial Flower Symmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Plantago, Tengia, Cadia and Microsteria, one CYC-like paralogue (or set of closely related paralogues in the case of Tengia) is expressed across the dorsoventral flower axis, owing to regulatory evolution either at or upstream of that paralogue. The other CYC-like paralogue has been lost (Plantago and Microsteria), or is no longer expressed in flowers (Cadia and Tengia) [80][81][82][83]. Alternatively, both CYC-like paralogues are expressed across the dorsoventral flower axis (Psychopterys), or neither is expressed in flowers (Sphedamnocarpus) [82].…”
Section: Evolutionary Transitions From Bilateral To Radial Flower Symmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of derived radial symmetry (from CYC-dependent bilateral symmetry) for which the expression of CYC homologues has been studied include Plantago (Plantaginaceae, Lamiales), Cadia (Fabaceae, Fabales), two independent transitions to radial from bilateral symmetry in Gesneriaceae (Lamiales)-Bournea and Tengia, and four independent transitions to radial from bilateral symmetry in Malpighiaceae (Malpighiales)-Psychopterys, Sphedamnocarpus, Microsteria and Lasiiocarpus (figure 4) [62,[80][81][82][83]. For each of these, two or more paralogous CYC-like genes are dorsally expressed in close relatives.…”
Section: Evolutionary Transitions From Bilateral To Radial Flower Symmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a different actinomorphic Gesneriaceae, Bournea leiophylla , exhibits rapid down-regulation of CYC2 expression at later developmental stages (Zhou et al, 2008), suggesting loss-of-function. Similarly, the actinomorphic flowers of Plantago , a member of the Plantaginaceae, are associated with degeneration of both the CYC -based dorsal identity and MYB-based ventral identity programs, although one CYC2 homolog is still broadly expressed (Preston et al, 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flower symmetry is of special interest in understanding angiosperm evolution (16). As flower bilateral symmetry is drawing more and more attention in different species, CYClike genes have been shown to be involved in the development of zygomorphy in different species (22,27,28). in legumes, numerous CYC-like genes have been isolated and found to have undergone repeated duplication events, implying that they might have divergent functions (1,11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%