2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2932341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradiometric micro-SQUID susceptometer for scanning measurements of mesoscopic samples

Abstract: We have fabricated and characterized micro-SQUID susceptometers for use in low-temperature scanning probe microscopy systems. The design features the following: a 4.6 mum diameter pickup loop; an integrated field coil to apply a local field to the sample; an additional counterwound pickup-loop/field-coil pair to cancel the background signal from the applied field in the absence of the sample; modulation coils to allow setting the SQUID at its optimum bias point (independent of the applied field), and shielding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
140
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, Hall-sensors and SQUID sensors are among the most sensitive magnetic field detectors. 4,5 Furthermore, a great deal of success has been achieved with magnetic resonance force microscopy, where the force between a magnetic tip and the magnetic moment under investigation is exploited to detect single electron-spins, achieving a resolution of a few cubic nanometers. [6][7][8] On the other hand, the very low temperatures that are required in such schemes represent a considerable drawback to imaging systems in many biological environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, Hall-sensors and SQUID sensors are among the most sensitive magnetic field detectors. 4,5 Furthermore, a great deal of success has been achieved with magnetic resonance force microscopy, where the force between a magnetic tip and the magnetic moment under investigation is exploited to detect single electron-spins, achieving a resolution of a few cubic nanometers. [6][7][8] On the other hand, the very low temperatures that are required in such schemes represent a considerable drawback to imaging systems in many biological environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning micro-and nanoscale SQUIDs are of particular interest for magnetic imaging due to their high sensitivity and large bandwidth 15,19 . The two main technological approaches to the fabrication of scanning SQUIDs are based on planar lithographic methods 21,26,[33][34][35][36] and on self-aligned SQUIDon-tip (SOT) deposition 22,24,37 .In the planar SQUID architecture, spatial resolution is limited but pickup and modulation coils can be integrated to allow operation of the SQUID at optimal flux bias conditions using a fluxlocked loop (FLL) feedback mechanism 15,18,19,21,33,38,39 . Because the magnetic field of the sample is not coupled to the SQUID loop directly, but rather through a pickup coil, integration of a modulation coil or an integrated current-carrying element 15,19,21,33,38,39 allows the total flux in the SQUID loop to be maintained at its optimal bias while the magnetic field of the sample is varied independently.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much effort has been devoted recently to the development of nanoSQUIDs, which have shown very promising flux sensitivity. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Most of these devices, however, are based on planar technology using lithographic or focused ion beam (FIB) patterning methods; 3-11 the large in-plane size of the devices precludes bringing the SQUID loop into sufficiently close proximity to the sample (due to alignment issues) to scan it with optimal sensitivity. Recently, a terraced SQUID susceptometer was developed that is based on a multilayered lithographic process combined with FIB etching.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%