1992
DOI: 10.1177/001440299205900107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grading Secondary Vocational Education Students with Disabilities: A National Perspective

Abstract: A nationwide purposive sample of secondary vocational educators completed a questionnaire that examined practices and perceptions toward grading students with disabilities. A variety of grading methods was reportedly used, but over two-thirds of respondents included a competency-based grading component. An overwhelming majority believed that student effort should be used to determine grades. Two-thirds of vocational educators had never been involved in their students' IEP development. The most common changes t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grading included students with disabilities can become problematic for educators for a variety of reasons. Researchers have identified five common problems associated with grading included students with disabilities (Bietau, 1995;Bradley & Calvin, 1998;Calhoun, 1986;Christianson & Vogel, 1998;Donahue & Zigmond, 1990;Drucker & Hansen, 1982;Frisbie & Waltman, 1992;Hendrickson & Gable, 1997;Marzano, 2000;Munk, 2003;Munk & Bursuck, 2002, 1998a, 1998b, 2002Munk, Bursuck, & Silva, 2004;Rojewski, Pollard, & Meers, 1992;Salend & Duhaney, 2002):…”
Section: When Should We Use Grading Adaptations?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grading included students with disabilities can become problematic for educators for a variety of reasons. Researchers have identified five common problems associated with grading included students with disabilities (Bietau, 1995;Bradley & Calvin, 1998;Calhoun, 1986;Christianson & Vogel, 1998;Donahue & Zigmond, 1990;Drucker & Hansen, 1982;Frisbie & Waltman, 1992;Hendrickson & Gable, 1997;Marzano, 2000;Munk, 2003;Munk & Bursuck, 2002, 1998a, 1998b, 2002Munk, Bursuck, & Silva, 2004;Rojewski, Pollard, & Meers, 1992;Salend & Duhaney, 2002):…”
Section: When Should We Use Grading Adaptations?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a later study, Rojewski, Pollard, and Meers (1992) continued their efforts to describe grading practices and perceptions toward grading students with disabilities in vocational classrooms. Competency-based (criterion-referenced) assessment was preferred by 69.2% of the teachers.…”
Section: Instructional and Setting Demandsmentioning
confidence: 99%