2019
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Ki-67 Index Evaluated on Fine-Needle Aspiration Cell Block Material

Abstract: Objectives This study aimed to determine whether Ki-67 index evaluated on cytologic material could reliably grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). Methods Cases with adequate cell block and available surgical specimens were included. Ki-67 index was calculated using “eyeballing,” “hot spot,” and “complete” counting methods. Results The overall conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assistance of artificial intelligence in digital image analysis has shown increased efficiency with comparable results to manual mitotic counts in breast cancer and melanoma 23‐25 . Artificial intelligence has been used in cell block material of gastric neuroendocrine tumours in the calculation of the Ki‐67 proliferation index 26,27 . However, there is no set risk stratification in GISTs for the use of the Ki‐67 proliferation index and artificial intelligence for mitotic counts has not yet been studied in either GISTs or cytology cell block material.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assistance of artificial intelligence in digital image analysis has shown increased efficiency with comparable results to manual mitotic counts in breast cancer and melanoma 23‐25 . Artificial intelligence has been used in cell block material of gastric neuroendocrine tumours in the calculation of the Ki‐67 proliferation index 26,27 . However, there is no set risk stratification in GISTs for the use of the Ki‐67 proliferation index and artificial intelligence for mitotic counts has not yet been studied in either GISTs or cytology cell block material.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the tissue annotation method did not appear to provide superior concordance, the added labour time for pathologists to annotate these cases does not appear to add significant benefit for CD8 quantification in small biopsies. In addition, we know that quantification by IA can be challenging, especially near the cut‐off values that are set and in cases with heterogeneity which is inherent in small biopsy sampling, and has been discussed in the literature extensively with respect to Ki67 grading in neuroendocrine tumours …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is difficult to translate to cytological samples, since change in architecture in cell block sections will obviously have a significant impact on how mitotic activity will be assessed. In addition, studies on the use of immunohistochemical markers such as ki‐67 on cell blocks is still controversial, with most studies showing good concordance between low‐grade G1 tumors, but underestimation of higher grade lesions . Additional studies with larger comparisons of cell block and resection specimens may be needed to clarify the role of using grading in cytology and a possible incorporation of proposed guidelines in the future versions of classification systems.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is difficult to translate to cytological samples, since change in architecture in cell block sections will obviously have a significant impact on how mitotic activity will be assessed. In addition, studies on the use of immunohistochemical markers such as ki-67 on cell blocks is still controversial, [27][28][29] with most studies showing good concordance between low-grade G1…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation