1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb05060.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grading in Superficial Bladder Cancer. (1) Morphological Criteria

Abstract: In a prospective study on the grading of superficial papillary neoplasms of the bladder a distinction was made between tumours showing only increased cellularity without appreciable cellular and nuclear deviation (grade 1), tumours showing slight cellular variation (grade 2a), and tumours showing clear cytological deviation and a tendency to lose normal polarity (grade 2b). Ninety-one patients with a superficial tumour were followed up for a mean of 24 months. Grade 2a tumours recurred later and in fewer patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(11 reference statements)
4
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The present findings suggest that the distribution of tumor types may vary by gender and age, and thus the demographics of the selected referral population could affect the distribution of tumor types. Table III compares pathological stage distribution between the present population-based study and representative previously reported studies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]21,22], all but one of which [14] were based on selected, hospital-or clinic-based patient populations. The hospital-or clinic-based series show a range of non-invasive (stage pTa) tumors between 30 and 49%, compared with 66% in this population-based sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present findings suggest that the distribution of tumor types may vary by gender and age, and thus the demographics of the selected referral population could affect the distribution of tumor types. Table III compares pathological stage distribution between the present population-based study and representative previously reported studies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]21,22], all but one of which [14] were based on selected, hospital-or clinic-based patient populations. The hospital-or clinic-based series show a range of non-invasive (stage pTa) tumors between 30 and 49%, compared with 66% in this population-based sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Historically, most of the data on the distribution of grade and stage of bladder cancer have been derived from retrospective studies on selected, often hospital-or clinic-based, patient populations [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Such studies are likely to include a disproportionate number of patients with more aggressive or advanced stage tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actuarial risk of dying within 5 years after diagnosis was 25% (95% CI: 23-27%) (Figure 4 (Jordan et al, 1987;Pauwels et al, 1988;Richards et al, 1991). Although the stage distribution is believed to be a better measure for comparison, different interpretations of the pT category by different pathologists are also possible (Abel et al, 1988a;Kurth et al, 1989;Parmar et al, 1989;Herr & Jakse, 1991 For comparison the Dutch population was given the same age and sex distribution as the study population Figure 4 Actuarial survival (%) in patients with superficial TCC of the bladder (with 95% confidence interval) compared to the Dutch population.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lack of uniformity in definitions, reflected in the number of different classification/grading systems which have been proposed for these neoplasms. 1,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Until a few years ago, the 1973 World Health Organization (WHO) 27 scheme appeared to be the most widely recognized and utilized. In an attempt to provide a method of categorization that more accurately reflects a tumor's biologic behavior, and to establish greater uniformity in defining urothelial lesions, the WHO/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) 32 issued a consensus statement in 1998 regarding the classification of urothelial lesions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%