2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradient Sensing: Engineering the Yeast Love Affair

Abstract: A new study in fission yeasts promotes the notion that transient polarity patches that wander the cell surface at the onset of mating are discrete agents of gradient sensing. This concept unexpectedly bridges the modes of gradient sensing in eukaryotes and prokaryotes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacteria continuously move through a concentration gradient and use local sampling in conjunction with temporal averaging to bias their movement towards the gradient source. This appears to be similar to local sampling as described in budding and fission yeast where the polarised assembly 'moves' through the gradient [53]. How could yeasts and metazoans compare the temporally offset measurements?…”
Section: Local Sampling Versus Global Inhibitory Signalling à a Modelsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bacteria continuously move through a concentration gradient and use local sampling in conjunction with temporal averaging to bias their movement towards the gradient source. This appears to be similar to local sampling as described in budding and fission yeast where the polarised assembly 'moves' through the gradient [53]. How could yeasts and metazoans compare the temporally offset measurements?…”
Section: Local Sampling Versus Global Inhibitory Signalling à a Modelsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This appears to be similar to local sampling as described in budding and fission yeast where the polarised assembly 'moves' through the gradient [53]. How is this possible in a local sampling system in which a single concentration is measured per sampling and how could a single measurement let the cell commit to growth towards a single direction?…”
Section: Local Sampling Versus Global Inhibitory Signalling à a Modelmentioning
confidence: 79%