2014
DOI: 10.1159/000369028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradient Phonetic Implementation of Regressive Voicing Assimilation in Catalan Heterosyllabic Two- and Three-Consonant Clusters

Abstract: Electroglottographic data for word-final obstruents in C#C and CC#C sequences with a word-initial voiced consonant indicate that regressive voicing adaptation is a categorical and thus assimilatory process for most Catalan speakers. Word-final obstruents are planned as voiced since they exhibit full voicing or else an initial voicing period which is longer than the voicing lag associated with the vowel preceding the cluster. Segmental duration may also be used by speakers for realizing word-final obstruents as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They may involve phonetic segments produced with overlapping articulators (e.g., front lingual /n/ and labial /p/ in the sequence /np/ may be realized as [mp], [um ˈpam] for /un pam/), or phonetic segments produced with the same or a neighboring articulator and differing in degree of articulatory constraint. (p. 11) Recasens (2014) said that the relative prominence of the regressive and progressive direction of the C-to-V assimilatory and dissimilatory changes will be inferred from a comparison between the frequency of occurrence of the contextual consonants located immediately after and before the target unstressed vowel. (p. 70)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may involve phonetic segments produced with overlapping articulators (e.g., front lingual /n/ and labial /p/ in the sequence /np/ may be realized as [mp], [um ˈpam] for /un pam/), or phonetic segments produced with the same or a neighboring articulator and differing in degree of articulatory constraint. (p. 11) Recasens (2014) said that the relative prominence of the regressive and progressive direction of the C-to-V assimilatory and dissimilatory changes will be inferred from a comparison between the frequency of occurrence of the contextual consonants located immediately after and before the target unstressed vowel. (p. 70)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Great emphasis has been put on the fact that assimilation does not result in 100% phonetic voicing, nor is it supposed to. Rather than being categorical, this process may occur to various degrees and remain incomplete (see, e.g., Jansen, 2004; Recasens, 2014; Snoeren, Hallé, & Segui, 2006). Moreover, it is very common even for VCV sequences where C is a lenis obstruent to show some devoicing in the middle of the consonant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%