Abstract:The distribution pattern of muscarinic receptors in N1E 115 mouse neuroblastoma cells after linear and non-linear gradient centrifugation was investigated. In untreated cells, at least two forms of the receptors, with different densities, were found.
“…Receptor stimulation by agonists elicits not only a rapid modulation of a second messenger response, but also phosphorylation, internalization, and down-regulation of the receptor itself. The sequestration process can be detected by cell fractionation as a cell surface receptor redistribution into a membrane fraction that exhibits a lower density than that of the plasma membrane (Harden et al ., 1985 ;Fraeyman and Buyse, 1989) . More routinely, this phenomenon is monitored as a reduction in the number of binding sites for hydrophilic ligands in intact cells after agonist stimulation (Feigenbaum and El-Fakahany, 1985 ;Baumgold et al ., 1989 ;Cioffi and El-Fakahany, 1989 ; Thompson and Fisher, 1990) .…”
We have characterized the internalization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors induced by the nitric oxide (NO)generating compound sodium nitroprusside. When Chinese hamster ovary cells, stably transfected with the human m4 muscarinic receptor subtype, were incubated for 1 h in the presence of 700,uM sodium nitroprusside, the number of receptors measured in intact cells with the hydrophilic ligand N-[3H]methylscopolamine was reduced by 30%. The effect was dose dependent, beginning with a concentration of sodium nitroprusside as low as 45 AM. Removal of sodium nitroprusside from the incubation medium did not result in a recovery of the binding sites. The phenomenon was temperature dependent and was blocked by the muscarinic antagonist atropine . No receptor diminution was detected when the number of binding sites was evaluated with the lipophilic antagonist [3 H]quinuclidinyl benzilate. This indicates that sodium nitroprusside induces a redistribution of the muscarinic receptors between the plasma membrane and an internal compartment of the cell . Receptor loss was readily reversed by treatment with the sulfhydryl reducing agent diethyldithiocarbamate . Our data provide evidence that muscarinic receptors are internalized by sodium nitroprusside through the oxidation of sulfhydryl groups ; they also suggest that NO could play a role in muscarinic receptor desensitization.Abbreviations used; CHO cells, Chinese hamster ovary cells ; NO, nitric oxide ; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline .
“…Receptor stimulation by agonists elicits not only a rapid modulation of a second messenger response, but also phosphorylation, internalization, and down-regulation of the receptor itself. The sequestration process can be detected by cell fractionation as a cell surface receptor redistribution into a membrane fraction that exhibits a lower density than that of the plasma membrane (Harden et al ., 1985 ;Fraeyman and Buyse, 1989) . More routinely, this phenomenon is monitored as a reduction in the number of binding sites for hydrophilic ligands in intact cells after agonist stimulation (Feigenbaum and El-Fakahany, 1985 ;Baumgold et al ., 1989 ;Cioffi and El-Fakahany, 1989 ; Thompson and Fisher, 1990) .…”
We have characterized the internalization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors induced by the nitric oxide (NO)generating compound sodium nitroprusside. When Chinese hamster ovary cells, stably transfected with the human m4 muscarinic receptor subtype, were incubated for 1 h in the presence of 700,uM sodium nitroprusside, the number of receptors measured in intact cells with the hydrophilic ligand N-[3H]methylscopolamine was reduced by 30%. The effect was dose dependent, beginning with a concentration of sodium nitroprusside as low as 45 AM. Removal of sodium nitroprusside from the incubation medium did not result in a recovery of the binding sites. The phenomenon was temperature dependent and was blocked by the muscarinic antagonist atropine . No receptor diminution was detected when the number of binding sites was evaluated with the lipophilic antagonist [3 H]quinuclidinyl benzilate. This indicates that sodium nitroprusside induces a redistribution of the muscarinic receptors between the plasma membrane and an internal compartment of the cell . Receptor loss was readily reversed by treatment with the sulfhydryl reducing agent diethyldithiocarbamate . Our data provide evidence that muscarinic receptors are internalized by sodium nitroprusside through the oxidation of sulfhydryl groups ; they also suggest that NO could play a role in muscarinic receptor desensitization.Abbreviations used; CHO cells, Chinese hamster ovary cells ; NO, nitric oxide ; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline .
“…Agonist occupancy of neural muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) elicits not only a rapid modulation of either adenylyl cyclase or phosphoinositidase C (PIC) activities, but also a slower adaptive response in which the cell surface receptors are internalized into a more hydrophobic cell compart-ment. The latter process, termed receptor sequestration, can be monitored following cell fractionation as a redistribution of cell surface receptors into a membrane fraction that exhibits a lower density than that of the plasma membrane (Harden et al, 1985;Fraeyman and Buyse, 1989). However, it is more routinely detected as an agonist-induced reduction in the number of binding sites for hydrophilic ligands in intact cells (Fiegenbaum and El-Fakahany, 1985;Baumgold et al, 1989;Cioffi and El-Fakahany, 1989; Thompson and Fisher, 1990).…”
The feasibility of using a permeabilized preparation of human SH‐SY‐5Y neuroblastoma cells for studies of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) sequestration has been evaluated. Exposure of cells permeabilized with digitonin, streptolysin‐O, or the α‐toxin from Staphylococcus aureus to oxotremorine‐M (Oxo‐M) for 30 min resulted in a 25–30% reduction in the number of cell surface mAChRs, as monitored by the loss of N[3H]methyl‐ scopolamine ([3H]NMS) binding sites. The corresponding value for intact cells was 40%. For cells permeabilized with 20 μM digitonin, the Oxo‐M‐mediated reduction in [3H]NMS binding was time (t1/2∼ 5 min) and concentration (EC50∼ 10 μM) dependent and was agonist specific (Oxo M > bethanechol = arecoline = pilocarpine). In contrast, no reduction in total mAChR number, as monitored by the binding of [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate, occurred following Oxo‐M treatment. The loss of [3H]NMS sites observed in the presence of Oxo‐M was unaffected by omission of either ATP or Ca2+, both of which are required for stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis, but could be inhibited by the inclusion of guanosine 5′‐O‐(2‐thiodiphosphate). mAChRs sequestered in response to Oxo‐M addition were unmasked when the cells were permeabilized in the presence of higher concentrations of digitonin (80 μM). The results indicate (a) that permeabilized SH‐SY‐5Y cells support an agonist‐induced sequestration of mAChRs, the magnitude of which is ∼ 65–70% of that observed for intact cells, (b) that when internalized, mAChRs are located in a cellular compartment to which [3H]NMS has only a limited access despite the removal of the plasma membrane barrier, and (c) that the production of phosphoinositide‐derived second messengers is not a prerequisite for mAChR sequestration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.