2014
DOI: 10.1137/130925712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradient Bounds for Wachspress Coordinates on Polytopes

Abstract: Abstract. We derive upper and lower bounds on the gradients of Wachspress coordinates defined over any simple convex d-dimensional polytope P . The bounds are in terms of a single geometric quantity h * , which denotes the minimum distance between a vertex of P and any hyperplane containing a non-incident face. We prove that the upper bound is sharp for d = 2 and analyze the bounds in the special cases of hypercubes and simplices. Additionally, we provide an implementation of the Wachspress coordinates on conv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However it should be clear from the very beginning that VEMs allow much more general geometries. For these more general geometries the comparison should actually be done between VEMs and other methods designed for polytopes, as for instance [11], [15], [19], [21], [23], [26], [27], [28], [31], [33], [34], [37]. The natural comparison, within Finite Elements, of our V f k,k−1,k−1 elements are clearly the BDM spaces as described in (2.20) for triangles (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Comparisons With Finite Elements the Comparison Between Vemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it should be clear from the very beginning that VEMs allow much more general geometries. For these more general geometries the comparison should actually be done between VEMs and other methods designed for polytopes, as for instance [11], [15], [19], [21], [23], [26], [27], [28], [31], [33], [34], [37]. The natural comparison, within Finite Elements, of our V f k,k−1,k−1 elements are clearly the BDM spaces as described in (2.20) for triangles (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Comparisons With Finite Elements the Comparison Between Vemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-dimensional formulation has been extended to three dimensions (convex polyhedra) by Warren [79,80]. A Matlab code that is based on yet another definition of Wachspress coordinates is provided by Floater et al [81]. Their definition is based on the unit normal outward vector n i corresponding to edge x i x i+1 and the perpendicular distance h i of x to that edge…”
Section: Wachspress Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, we briefly discuss an extension to complex three-dimensional problems and show that such an extension is straightforward. To this end, three-dimensional generalized barycentric coordinates are deployed as demonstrated in various articles, such as [15,79,81,84,87,101,102]. The spacetree-based adaptive integration technique could be reduced to the already known case encountered in the tetrahedral version of the FCM [105,107].…”
Section: Three-dimensional Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cantilever Beam problem was solved with our GPU EbEPCG solution using two meshes: one with polyhedron elements and other one with hexahedral. For the polyhedral case, we used Wachspress coordinates as defined in Floater et al (2014) and analyzed in Warren et al (2007). These coordinates are valid for elements that are not only convex but also simple.…”
Section: D Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%