2015
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmm.14.2.023504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradient-based joint source polarization mask optimization for optical lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it allows for more design freedom than the sole mask or source optimization for PEC. This approach was first proposed by Rosenbluth et al [14] and then followed by research works on the pixelated gradient-based SMO algorithms [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. A variety of computational workflows such as simultaneous, sequential, and hybrid SMO schemes has been proposed to solve the optimization problem [22].…”
Section: Optical Projection Lithography and Proximity Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it allows for more design freedom than the sole mask or source optimization for PEC. This approach was first proposed by Rosenbluth et al [14] and then followed by research works on the pixelated gradient-based SMO algorithms [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. A variety of computational workflows such as simultaneous, sequential, and hybrid SMO schemes has been proposed to solve the optimization problem [22].…”
Section: Optical Projection Lithography and Proximity Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance the performance of the pixelated SO methods, a set of algorithms have been proposed, including gradientbased [17], [18] and heuristic algorithms [19], [20]. In these methods, the pattern errors, as a generally utilized merit function in the iteration procedure, can be defined by calculating the cumulative sum of the difference between the resist pattern (RP) and the desired image with point-by-point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional gradient-based methods of solving optimization problems, such as conjugate gradient (CG) [5,6], steepest descent (SD) [7], and gradient descent (GD) [8][9][10], have been used to solve the SMO problem. These methods are relatively efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%