2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GRACES observations of young [α/Fe]-rich stars

Abstract: We measure chemical abundance ratios and radial velocities in four massive (i.e., young) [α/Fe]-rich red giant stars using high-resolution high-S/N spectra from ES-PaDOnS fed by Gemini-GRACES. Our differential analysis ensures that our chemical abundances are on the same scale as the Alves-Brito et al. (2010) study of bulge, thin and thick disk red giants. We confirm that the program stars have enhanced [α/Fe] ratios and are slightly metal poor. Aside from lithium enrichment in one object, the program stars ex… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
66
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has recently become evident with the unexpected results of Chiappini et al (2015) and Martig et al (2015), who used CoRoT (Baglin et al 2006) and Kepler (Gilliland et al 2010) asteroseismic ages, respectively, combined with APOGEE chemical information, to show the existence of significantly young high-[α/Fe] stars (but see also Yong et al 2016). This is a largely unexpected result for chemical evolution modeling, because [α/Fe] has been thought to always be a good proxy for age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This has recently become evident with the unexpected results of Chiappini et al (2015) and Martig et al (2015), who used CoRoT (Baglin et al 2006) and Kepler (Gilliland et al 2010) asteroseismic ages, respectively, combined with APOGEE chemical information, to show the existence of significantly young high-[α/Fe] stars (but see also Yong et al 2016). This is a largely unexpected result for chemical evolution modeling, because [α/Fe] has been thought to always be a good proxy for age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such stars found by Chiappini et al (2015) were primarily in the inner Galactic disk, and they invoked formation at the end of the Galactic bar; although this is inconsistent with KELT-21ʼs current circular orbit and location near the solar circle, as mentioned earlier it could still have formed in the inner Galaxy and experienced radial mixing to move it to its current location, although this would have needed to be rapid in order to move the star several kiloparsecs within the 1.6 Gyr since it formed. The planet orbiting KELT-21 also seems to be at odds with the other proposed explanation for young α-rich stars, namely, that they are blue stragglers formed from stellar mergers (Jofré et al 2016;Yong et al 2016). Such a collision would have destroyed any short-period planet already around one of the stars; KELT-21b would have needed to either form from material thrown off in the collision, or have survived the collision at a larger semimajor axis and only migrated after the collision.…”
Section: Metal Content and Galactic Contextmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…9). Understanding the origin of these stars has been the subject of a number of recent studies and they have been attributed to migrators from the Galactic bar (Chiappini et al 2015) as well as evolved blue stragglers (Martig et al 2015;Chiappini et al 2015;Yong et al 2016;Jofre et al 2016). In the former case it is believed that these stars formed in reservoirs of al- most inert gas close to the end of the Galactic bar, while the latter scenario proposes that the young α-rich stars are the product of mass transfer or stellar merger events.…”
Section: The Age Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%