2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03232-6_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gracefully Degrading Gathering in Dynamic Rings

Abstract: Gracefully degrading algorithms [Biely et al., TCS 2018] are designed to circumvent impossibility results in dynamic systems by adapting themselves to the dynamics. Indeed, such an algorithm solves a given problem under some dynamics and, moreover, guarantees that a weaker (but related) problem is solved under a higher dynamics under which the original problem is impossible to solve. The underlying intuition is to solve the problem whenever possible but to provide some kind of quality of service if the dynami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [13] the problem of PERPETUAL EXPLORATION (i.e., every node is to be visited infinitely often ) was studied in temporally connected (i.e., may not be always connected but connected over time) graphs. Other problems studied in dynamic graphs include GATHERING [3,21,24], DISPERSION [1,18], PATROLLING [6] etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [13] the problem of PERPETUAL EXPLORATION (i.e., every node is to be visited infinitely often ) was studied in temporally connected (i.e., may not be always connected but connected over time) graphs. Other problems studied in dynamic graphs include GATHERING [3,21,24], DISPERSION [1,18], PATROLLING [6] etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any (u, v) ∈ S, we define φ((u, v)) to be the position of (u, v) in this arrangement. For example, if k = 4, then the elements of S, arranged in lexicographic order, are (1,2), (1,3), (1,4), (2,3), (2,4), (3,4). Therefore, we have φ((2, 4)) = 5 and φ((3, 4)) = 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation on the use of mobile agents within dynamic graphs started relatively recently: following the way pursued in the static networks context, these studies focused mainly on the problems of exploration, patrolling and gathering ( Gotoh et al, 2020 ; Mandal, Molla & Moses, 2020 ; Das, Di Luna & Gasieniec, 2019a ; Di Luna et al, 2016 , 2018 ; Ilcinkas, Klasing & Wade, 2014 ; Ilcinkas & Wade, 2013 ), all assuming the 1-interval connected networks. Under weaker models of connectivity, the only problem ever studied, to the best of our knowledge, is a weaker version of the gathering, where all agents but one gather ( Bournat, Dubois & Petit, 2018 ). An up-to-date survey on computing by mobile agents on dynamic graph is in Di Luna (2019) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2013), all assuming the 1-interval connected networks. Under weaker models of connectivity, the only problem ever studied, to the best of our knowledge, is a weaker version of the gathering, where all agents but one gather Bournat et al (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%