2019
DOI: 10.1177/2192568219847206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grab Control! Choosing the Right Comparison Group in an Observational Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, when patients with COVID-like symptoms are used as controls, it is possible to determine which laboratory parameters might be specific for SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of the symptoms. 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, when patients with COVID-like symptoms are used as controls, it is possible to determine which laboratory parameters might be specific for SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of the symptoms. 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, there were no COVID-specific parameters among the baseline hematological and biochemical analyses; and secondly, there are a lot of common viral infections among children, which may present with similar laboratory findings. 22 , 23 Therefore, healthy children formed a more convenient control group in our study, given that they showed us various alterations in laboratory parameters such as leukocytosis, lymphopenia, thrombocytosis, elevated SII and NLR, hyponatremia, hypochloremia and elevated levels of AST, ALT, LDH and CRP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a control group would enable researchers to investigate potential risk factors or associations contributing to the development of ptosis, enhancing the depth of the study’s analysis. 4 , 5 …”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Misidentifying a study can either over or under-label the level of evidence 17 . A recent review of articles published in the Journal of Neurosurgery showed that only 48% of those touted as case-control were truly case-control studies, showing a high rate of misidentifying study type 33,34 . Accurate reporting and reader understanding of a given study design is not only important for LOE reporting but affects the strength of study conclusions/findings and overall validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%