GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models

Abstract

We investigate the potential implications of large language models (LLMs), such as Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPTs), on the U.S. labor market, focusing on the increased capabilities arising from LLM-powered software compared to LLMs on their own. Using a new rubric, we assess occupations based on their alignment with LLM capabilities, integrating both human expertise and GPT-4 classifications. Our findings reveal that around 80% of the U.S. workforce could have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by the introduction of LLMs, while approximately 19% of workers may see at least 50% of their tasks impacted. We do not make predictions about the development or adoption timeline of such LLMs. The projected effects span all wage levels, with higher-income jobs potentially facing greater exposure to LLM capabilities and LLM-powered software. Significantly, these impacts are not restricted to industries with higher recent productivity growth. Our analysis suggests that, with access to an LLM, about 15% of all worker tasks in the US could be completed significantly faster at the same level of quality. When incorporating software and tooling built on top of LLMs, this share increases to between 47 and 56% of all tasks. This finding implies that LLM-powered software will have a substantial effect on scaling the economic impacts of the underlying models. We conclude that LLMs such as GPTs exhibit traits of general-purpose technologies, indicating that they could have considerable economic, social, and policy implications.

Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence

“…The emergence of powerful generative AI technologies reintroduces a host of classic questions in a new context (3)(4)(5). Automation technologies by definition perform specific tasks in place of humans.…”

A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures

“…• It is essential to consider the ethical and social consequences of using these models, such as job displacement [22] and the risk of bias and manipulation. Additionally, the potential for ChatGPT to be used to spread misinformation, propaganda, or for harmful purposes like identity theft must be explored.…”

ChatGPT Decision Support System: Utility in Creating Public Policy for Concussion/Repetitive Brain Trauma Associated With Neurodegenerative Diseases

“…A petition has been distributed among technologists to suggest AI research and development be paused due to a lack of understanding its effects. 38 On the other hand, AI has suffered from an overestimation of its performance projecting mass labor market disruption 39 while failing to realize the difficulty to accomplish human replacement.…”