GPS measurements (2003–2006) in the Sikhote Alin network, the Far East

Timofeev, V. Yu.; Gornov, P. Yu.; Ardyukov, D. G.; Malyshev, Yu. F.; Бойко, Е В

doi:10.1134/s1819714008040040

Cited by 10 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, we can conclude that all the models approximately equally fit the observed GPS velocity field. They do not give evidence of any significant recent geodynamic activity of the CSAF as a whole, as reported by Ivanov (1972) based on geological data and Timofeev et al (2008) resting upon data from a single GPS profile across the CSAF. However, the tested CSAF models do not correspond well to the observed GPS velocity field.…”

Section: Recent Geodynamic Activity Of the Csafmentioning

confidence: 57%

“…6a). The next set of the AMU/EUR models includes the models of Zonenshain & Savostin (1981), England & Molnar (2005), Timofeev et al . (2008), Kreemer et al .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… semi‐continuous and continuous GPS measurements carried out in the southeast of Russia under collaboration of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and Association of Japanese Universities; campaign‐mode measurements conducted during 2003–2007 across the CSAF by the united team of the Institute of Tectonics and Geophysics of the Far Eastern Branch of the RAS and the Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics of the Siberian Branch of the RAS (Timofeev et al . 2008); continuous observations started at the GPS station VLAD in 1996 under the WING project (Kato et al .…”

Section: Gps Data and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6a). The next set of the AMU/EUR models includes the models of Zonenshain & Savostin (1981), England & Molnar (2005), Timofeev et al (2008), Kreemer et al (2003), Apel et al (2006), Calais et al (2006), Meng et al (2006) and is characterized by the misfit values ranging from 16 to 36. These models predict almost east and southeast velocities with the magnitudes in general more consistent with our estimates compared to previous groups.…”

Section: Obtained Gps Velocity Field and Amu Microplate Rigid Rotationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, based on the previous geological studies, Ivanov (1972) estimated the slip‐rate of the eastern CSAF flank to be equal to 5–7 mm yr −1 with respect to the western flank. Timofeev et al . (2008) have recently estimated this value to be approximately equal to 1.5 mm yr −1 based on a velocity set of 6 GPS stations across the CSAF trace observed in campaign mode.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Present tectonics of the southeast of Russia as seen from GPS observations

Shestakov

Gerasimenko

Takahashi

et al. 2010

Geophysical Journal International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present tectonics of Northeast Asia has been extensively investigated during the last 12 yr by using GPS techniques. Nevertheless, crustal velocity field of the southeast of Russia near the northeastern boundaries of the hypothesized Amurian microplate has not been defined yet. The GPS data collected between 1997 February and 2009 April at sites of the regional geodynamic network were used to estimate the recent geodynamic activity of this area. The calculated GPS velocities indicate almost internal (between network sites) and external (with respect to the Eurasian tectonic plate) stability of the investigated region. We have not found clear evidences of any notable present-day tectonic activity of the Central Sikhote-Alin Fault as a whole. This fault is the main tectonic unit that determines the geological structure of the investigated region. The obtained results speak in favour of the existence of a few separate blocks and a more sophisticated structure of the proposed Amurian microplate in comparison with an indivisible plate approach

show abstract

Section: Recent Geodynamic Activity Of the Csafmentioning

confidence: 57%

“…6a). The next set of the AMU/EUR models includes the models of Zonenshain & Savostin (1981), England & Molnar (2005), Timofeev et al . (2008), Kreemer et al .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Gps Data and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Obtained Gps Velocity Field and Amu Microplate Rigid Rotationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Present tectonics of the southeast of Russia as seen from GPS observations

Shestakov

Gerasimenko

Takahashi

et al. 2010

Geophysical Journal International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Boundaries of the Amurian Plate identified using multiple geophysical methods

Wang

2019

Geosci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study of the tectonic structure and modern geodynamics of the nickel-copper-sulfide Kun-Manyo deposit at the stage of its field the development

Potapchuk

Rasskazov

Usikov

et al. 2021

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently, the Kun-Manyo nickel-copper-sulfide deposit in the north of the Khabarovsk Krai is being prepared for development, with part of the reserves expected to be mined by underground mining. To justify the rational order of opening and excavation of sub-ore reserves it is necessary to have objective information on rock mass condition, which can be received as a result of complex geodynamic and geomechanical investigations. The established geodynamic position of the deposit, determined by its location at the junction of actively interacting large tectonic elements of the Euro-Asian tectonic plate – the tectonic stress of the North Asian craton and the Amur plate, as well as within the modern Olekmo-Stanovo seismic zone, has allowed the massif of the field area to be classified as tectonically stressed. An analysis of the data of the GPS-observation points on the territory of the Russian part of the Amur tectonic plate, the results of calculations of the vector field of velocities of modern movements of points, made within the framework of the ITRF – 2000 coordinate system, as well as the results of in-situ geomechanical studies of rock massifs of the Amur Plate’s rock-bump hazardous deposits, have made it possible to establish the current tectonic regime of the deposit area – a region of intense modern compression with a predicted intensity of more than 50 MPa. By methods of morphometric analysis and remote sensing, it has been found that the relative relief excesses were significant (700–1000 m), which may lead to an uncompensated horizontal component of geostatic stress. The most extended lineaments of the relief have predominantly southeasterly extension. The identified features of the tectonic structure and regional neotectonics have made it possible to determine the most probable direction and magnitude of the current main horizontal compression, which could be further used in solving various geomechanical problems in the exploitation of the field.

show abstract

GPS measurements (2003–2006) in the Sikhote Alin network, the Far East

Cited by 10 publications

References 7 publications

Present tectonics of the southeast of Russia as seen from GPS observations

Present tectonics of the southeast of Russia as seen from GPS observations

Boundaries of the Amurian Plate identified using multiple geophysical methods

Study of the tectonic structure and modern geodynamics of the nickel-copper-sulfide Kun-Manyo deposit at the stage of its field the development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About