2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2010.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPS/INS integration utilizing dynamic neural networks for vehicular navigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
124
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, conventional methods (CMs) such as Auto Regression (AG), Moving Average (MA) and Auto Regression Moving Average (ARMA) have been examined for several case studies and show potential for accurate forecasting for medium stream-flow classes (Billings, 2013;Chen and Dyke, 2007;Clark et al, 2008;Husain, 1985;Kalman and others, 1960;Moradkhani et al, 2005;Noureldin et al, 2007;Schreider et al, 2001;Valipour et al, 2012;Veiga et al, 2014). However, it has been reported that 15 there are several drawbacks in developing these models (Clark et al, 2008;El-Shafie et al, 2012;Husain, 1985;Ju et al, 2009;Maier et al, 2004;Noureldin et al, 2007Noureldin et al, , 2011Schreider et al, 2001). The main meagreness that associated to the application of CMs methods for developing the forecasting model for stream-flow is the stipulation to integrate it with a pre-formulation of the trustful stochastic model to ascertain the source of uncertainty for the model input and output.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, conventional methods (CMs) such as Auto Regression (AG), Moving Average (MA) and Auto Regression Moving Average (ARMA) have been examined for several case studies and show potential for accurate forecasting for medium stream-flow classes (Billings, 2013;Chen and Dyke, 2007;Clark et al, 2008;Husain, 1985;Kalman and others, 1960;Moradkhani et al, 2005;Noureldin et al, 2007;Schreider et al, 2001;Valipour et al, 2012;Veiga et al, 2014). However, it has been reported that 15 there are several drawbacks in developing these models (Clark et al, 2008;El-Shafie et al, 2012;Husain, 1985;Ju et al, 2009;Maier et al, 2004;Noureldin et al, 2007Noureldin et al, , 2011Schreider et al, 2001). The main meagreness that associated to the application of CMs methods for developing the forecasting model for stream-flow is the stipulation to integrate it with a pre-formulation of the trustful stochastic model to ascertain the source of uncertainty for the model input and output.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models methods include Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN) and Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN) with ensemble procedure (El-Shafie and Noureldin, 2011). Actually, these models revealed appropriate prospective to achieve moderately high accuracy for stream-flow forecasting especially for 15 most of the peak events at AHD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML approaches have been broadly researched using soft computing engineering principles (Coppin, 2004;Ford, 1987;Gevarter, 1987;Noureldin, El-Shafie, & Bayoumi, 2011;Russell & Norvig, 2010). The most common ML models are designed by artificial intelligence (AI) techniques identify the nonlinear, dynamic, nonstationary relationships min predictor data for both regression and classification problems (Nourani, Hosseini Baghanam, Adamowski, & Kisi, 2014;Yaseen, El-shafie, Jaafar, Afan, & Sayl, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms are used to integrate the global positioning system (GPS) and inertial navigation system (INS) measurements [16][17][18][19][20]. Such systems are based on the neural networks [16][17][18], wavelets [18,19] and cross-validations [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%