2004
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-4-23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPs' decisions on drug treatment for patients with high cholesterol values: A think-aloud study

Abstract: Background: The purpose was to examine how General Practitioners (GPs) use clinical information and rules from guidelines in their decisions on drug treatment for high cholesterol values.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding of lower pre-treatment blood pressures in younger patients concurs with that of a survey in New Zealand [25]. It is also consistent with findings relating to cardiovascular prevention through cholesterol lowering: when describing their decision making GPs more commonly mention individual risk factor values than numerical risk estimates [26]. Decision making based on a single risk factor is more compromised by chance variation in that risk factor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our finding of lower pre-treatment blood pressures in younger patients concurs with that of a survey in New Zealand [25]. It is also consistent with findings relating to cardiovascular prevention through cholesterol lowering: when describing their decision making GPs more commonly mention individual risk factor values than numerical risk estimates [26]. Decision making based on a single risk factor is more compromised by chance variation in that risk factor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It appears that GPs and specialized practitioners do not share EBM's paramount concern with clinical effectiveness, but instead see it as one consideration in a wider concept that also includes patient-oriented concerns such as patient satisfaction, minimal infliction on patients' day-to-day life and incompatibility with other needs or treatments. Similar findings have been reported in the literature and seem to indicate a general consensus amongst the medical community regarding the limited value of EBM in promoting effective health care (Tomlin et al 1999;Backlund et al 2004;Skoglund et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These aspects of the coding are described in previous papers [8,9] and are not used in the present article.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two previous papers that were based on the same think-aloud experiment, we investigated the validity of Think-Aloud Reports compared with rating data for reflecting the decision process over time [8], and we analysed the importance of different patient characteristics and risk factors regarding prescription decisions [9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%