GPS, BDS-3, and Galileo Inter-Frequency Clock Bias Deviation Time-Varying Characteristics and Positioning Performance Analysis

Abstract

Multi-frequency observations are now available from GNSSs, thereby bringing new opportunities for precise point positioning (PPP). However, they also introduce new challenges, such as inter-frequency clock bias (IFCB) between the new frequencies and the original dual-frequency observations due to triple-frequency observations, which severely impact the PPP. In this paper, we studied the estimation and correction methods of uncombined inter-frequency clock bias of GPS, BDS-3, and Galileo, analyzed the time-varying characteristics and short-term stability of IFCB, and analyzed the influence of IFCB on the positioning of the GPS, BDS-3, and Galileo, based on a triple-frequency un-differential non-combined PPP model. The obtained results show that the amplitude of Block IIF satellites of the GPS can reach up to 10–20 cm, and the IFCB in BDS-3, Galileo, and GPS Block III satellites can be neglected. After correction by IFCB, the 3D positioning accuracy of the GPS triple-frequency PPP was 1.73 cm and 4.75 cm in the static and kinematic modes, respectively, while the convergence time was 21.64 min and 39.61 min. Compared with the triple-frequency GPS PPP without any correction with IFCB, the static and kinematic 3D positioning accuracy in this work was improved by 27.39% and 17.34%, and the corresponding convergence time was improved by 10.55% and 15.22%, respectively. Furthermore, the delayed IFCB was also used for positioning processing, and it was found that a positioning performance comparable to that of the same day can be obtained. The standard deviation of IFCB for a single satellite was found to be no more than 1 cm, when the IFCB value of a neighboring day was subtracted from the IFCB value of same day, which proves the short-term stability of IFCB.

BDS-3 six-frequency precise point positioning: effects of receiver-dependent inter-frequency clock bias and multi-frequency contributions

“…Due to different satellite designs and hardwares, the SIFCB magnitude of Galileo and BDS-3 satellites was marginal [7][8][9]. Chen et al [10] further studied the influence of SIFCB on BDS-3 and Galileo multi-frequency PPP, and the results showed that the positioning accuracy did not change significantly after correcting SIFCB.…”