2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPR trace analysis for coastal depositional environments of southern Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The GPR technology is quite versatile and has been consolidated since the 1980s. Currently, geoscientists have applied the GPR method in a range of approaches, such as interference mapping [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], natural resources exploration [24][25][26][27], environmental contamination studies [28][29][30][31], archaeological studies [32][33][34][35][36][37][38], forensic studies [39][40][41], sedimentological studies [42][43][44][45], studies of rivers and lakes [46][47][48], and so forth.…”
Section: Gpr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GPR technology is quite versatile and has been consolidated since the 1980s. Currently, geoscientists have applied the GPR method in a range of approaches, such as interference mapping [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], natural resources exploration [24][25][26][27], environmental contamination studies [28][29][30][31], archaeological studies [32][33][34][35][36][37][38], forensic studies [39][40][41], sedimentological studies [42][43][44][45], studies of rivers and lakes [46][47][48], and so forth.…”
Section: Gpr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a composite material such as soil composed of water, air and minerals, the soil dielectric permittivity is determined by the relative contributions of the components. Because the dielectric permittivities of minerals (ε ≈ 2-5) and air (ε ≈ 1) are less than that of liquid water (ε ≈ 81) at 20 • C [35,36], the soil dielectric permittivity is controlled by the presence of water in the soil.…”
Section: Experimental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barboza et al (2009Barboza et al ( , 2013Barboza et al ( , 2018 utilizaram o Georadar para avaliar os registros em subsuperfície de trechos da barreira holocênica ao longo da Bacia de Pelotas e defi nir seu padrão de empilhamento; Dillenburg et al (2011) compararam radarfácies de Georadar com litofácies de testemunhos sedimentares para determinar os limites entre diferentes depósitos costeiros; Lima et al (2013) aplicaram o Georadar para caracterizar o modelo evo-lutivo da barreira holocênica no extremo sul do RS (Hermenegildo); , Biancini da Silva et al (2014), e Leal et al (2016) analisaram registros de paleocanais fl uviais na região sul de Santa Catarina (SC); Rosa et al (2017) utilizaram o Georadar para analisar as escalas espaciais e temporais dos depósitos quaternários e propor um arcabouço estratigráfi co hierarquizado para a Bacia de Pelotas; Bitencourt et al (2016), Dillenburg et al (2017) e Manzolli et al (2018) utilizaram o Georadar para inferir o arcabouço sedimentar e o padrão de truncamentos de cordões litorâneos regressivos; Barboza et al (2018) apresentam a relação diácrona entre o máximo transgressivo e o máximo eustático do nível do mar no Holoceno. Recentemente, Leandro et al (2019) integraram dados de sondagens com análise de traço de Georadar para determinar o contato entre depósitos de ambientes deposicionais costeiros.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified