2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04813-0_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPR Data Processing Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, other automated survey techniques based on mobile laser systems (MLS) have also been improved to measure the road geometry (Wang et al 2008, Karamanou et al 2009, Pu et al 2011, Holgado-Barco et al 2014, to evaluate the pavement conditions (Dondi et al 2011, Aoki et al 2012, Lantieri et al 2015 and to estimate the slopes (Tsai et al 2013), in airport context too (Aerial Data Service 2010, Riesner 2014). The main advantages that have contributed to the success of MLS are the drastic reduction in surveying times, the plurality of data acquirable, namely data from laser scans, high-resolution images, ground-penetrating radar and profilometer, and the possibility of processing the data acquired at a later time (Sukumar et al 2006, Economou et al 2015. The very high productivity of the MLS is not always accompanied by a high accuracy of the position of the measured points, which depends on both the measuring instruments (laser scanner, high-resolution cameras) and the navigation subsystem (GNSS, IMU, odometer).…”
Section: Single Scan Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, other automated survey techniques based on mobile laser systems (MLS) have also been improved to measure the road geometry (Wang et al 2008, Karamanou et al 2009, Pu et al 2011, Holgado-Barco et al 2014, to evaluate the pavement conditions (Dondi et al 2011, Aoki et al 2012, Lantieri et al 2015 and to estimate the slopes (Tsai et al 2013), in airport context too (Aerial Data Service 2010, Riesner 2014). The main advantages that have contributed to the success of MLS are the drastic reduction in surveying times, the plurality of data acquirable, namely data from laser scans, high-resolution images, ground-penetrating radar and profilometer, and the possibility of processing the data acquired at a later time (Sukumar et al 2006, Economou et al 2015. The very high productivity of the MLS is not always accompanied by a high accuracy of the position of the measured points, which depends on both the measuring instruments (laser scanner, high-resolution cameras) and the navigation subsystem (GNSS, IMU, odometer).…”
Section: Single Scan Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPR is a non-destructive geophysical method that images the subsurface using radar pulses (Economou et al, 2015;Iqbal et al, 2020). GPR is notable for its notoriously difficult automated data analysis, although it is particularly promising for soil studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cassidy ; Economou et al . ) or improvements on specific flow steps, for example, ringing noise removal (Kim, Cho and Yi ), propagation effects compensation (Xavier Neto and Medeiros ), and background removal (Rashed and Harbi ; Montiel‐Zafra et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is extensive literature available on GPR processing, they often fall into two categories: generic processing (e.g. Cassidy 2009;Economou et al 2015) or improvements on specific flow steps, for example, ringing noise removal (Kim, Cho and Yi 2007), propagation effects compensation (Xavier Neto and Medeiros 2006), and background removal (Rashed and Harbi 2014;Montiel-Zafra et al 2017). Given the importance and the notorious difficulty of imaging and interpreting karstified carbonate rocks (Grasmueck et al 2013), we present here a flow for processing GPR data in carbonate karst.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%