2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11080984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPR Antipersonnel Mine Detection Based on Tensor Robust Principal Analysis

Abstract: The ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is a promising remote sensing modality for Antipersonnel Mine (APM) detection. However, detection of the buried APMs are impaired by strong clutter, especially the reflection caused by rough ground surfaces. In this paper, we propose a novel clutter suppression method taking advantage of the low-rank and sparse structure in multidimensional data, based on which an efficient target detection can be accomplished. We firstly created a multidimensional image tensor using sub-band… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) Anti-Tank vs Anti-Personnel Objects: It's not uncommon for GPR detection systems in EHD to be applied or evaluated against anti-tank (AT) or anti-personnel (AP) objects exclusively [32], [33], [20], [27], [34], [35], [36]. Specifically, in [37], the general notion that AP objects are more difficult to detect is clearly shown, as AP mines present more difficultly due to smaller size and less metallic content [1].…”
Section: A Comparison Of Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Anti-Tank vs Anti-Personnel Objects: It's not uncommon for GPR detection systems in EHD to be applied or evaluated against anti-tank (AT) or anti-personnel (AP) objects exclusively [32], [33], [20], [27], [34], [35], [36]. Specifically, in [37], the general notion that AP objects are more difficult to detect is clearly shown, as AP mines present more difficultly due to smaller size and less metallic content [1].…”
Section: A Comparison Of Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts can be made to improve the accuracy of the RTM with the complex geologies, especially with the irregular interface. From the perspective of GPR data processing, Song and Xiang [46], [47] proposed a new clutter suppression method, which can ensure the accuracy of anti-personnel mine detection and reduce the false alarm rate of detection in a strong clutter environment. In another aspect, J. H. Bradford [48] used terrain correction to improve RTM imaging results when faced with the problem of complex terrain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that although these methods can suppress noise to a certain extent, they all have some shortcomings. In terms of removing clutter, principal component analysis (PCA) [28], independent component analysis (ICA) [29], morphological component analysis (MCA) [30], non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) [31], go decomposition (GoDec) [32], robust matrix factorization (RMF) [33], robust orthonormal subspace learning (ROSL) [34], robust PCA (RPCA) [35], [36], and tensor RPCA (TRPCA) [37], [38] are all good methods. They divide GPR data into two categories through different methods, one corresponding to the clutter and the other corresponding to the target signal, thus achieving the purpose of clutter removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%