1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00349230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gpi genotypic effect on quantitative traits in the northern bay scallop, Argopecten irradians irradians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this experiment does not provide statistical support for the importance of heterozygosity in contributing to the success of the high-diversity populations in the field transplantation, or for the success of field populations that persist under elevated water temperature in summer. Although both enzymes have primary functional roles (MDH in the Krebs cycle, GPI in glycolysis) and have been included among loci associated with heterozygote advantage or heterosis (Schaal and Levin 1977, Koehn and Gaffney 1984, Nevo et al 1986, Strauss 1986, Oostermeijer et al 1994, Krause and Bricelj 1995, Toro et al 1996, I considered the IMPORTANCE OF EELGRASS GENETIC DIVERSITY loci as markers of genomic-level differences between plants from natural and transplanted eelgrass in San Diego. Any effect observed might be attributable to the locus itself (Watt 1977) or ones linked to it, but individual loci are unlikely to be correlated directly with quantitative traits such as growth rates (Turelli andGinzburg 1983, Burton 1990a, b).…”
Section: What Are the Consequences Of Reduced Genetic Diversity For Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this experiment does not provide statistical support for the importance of heterozygosity in contributing to the success of the high-diversity populations in the field transplantation, or for the success of field populations that persist under elevated water temperature in summer. Although both enzymes have primary functional roles (MDH in the Krebs cycle, GPI in glycolysis) and have been included among loci associated with heterozygote advantage or heterosis (Schaal and Levin 1977, Koehn and Gaffney 1984, Nevo et al 1986, Strauss 1986, Oostermeijer et al 1994, Krause and Bricelj 1995, Toro et al 1996, I considered the IMPORTANCE OF EELGRASS GENETIC DIVERSITY loci as markers of genomic-level differences between plants from natural and transplanted eelgrass in San Diego. Any effect observed might be attributable to the locus itself (Watt 1977) or ones linked to it, but individual loci are unlikely to be correlated directly with quantitative traits such as growth rates (Turelli andGinzburg 1983, Burton 1990a, b).…”
Section: What Are the Consequences Of Reduced Genetic Diversity For Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility to detect interactions between the forces shaping phenotypic expression and those maintaining its underlying genetic variation is to look for variation at a specific gene locus and to identify its effects on the phenotype (Krause & Bricelj 1995). In this context, enzymes that are involved in important metabolic pathways, for example, glycolytic enzymes, are of special interest, as glycolysis is the centre point of all ATP‐based energy supplies (Watt 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be the result of either direct effects at specific loci (the over-dominance hypothesis) or indirect effects as a result of linkage between markers and fitness-related traits (the associative over-dominance hypothesis), as reviewed in Zouros & Pogson (1994). Subsequent work has shown considerable variation among species, with some studies showing no relationship between growth or survival and heterozygosity (Volckaert & Zouros 1989, Fevolden 1992) and others showing a strong effect (Krause & Bricelj 1995). Careful studies now available have suggested that positive relationships between heterozygosity and growth vary among annual cohorts and arise from inbreeding effects and associative over-dominance in Spisula ovalis (David et al 1995, 1997a, David & Jarne 1997 and in Crassotrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) (McGoldrick & Hedgecock 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%