2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governmentalities of mobility: The role of housing in the governance of Australian rural mobilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown et al, 2015; Adamiak et al, 2017), along with important concepts such as ‘the lifecourse’ and insights from governmentality (e.g. Dufty-Jones, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brown et al, 2015; Adamiak et al, 2017), along with important concepts such as ‘the lifecourse’ and insights from governmentality (e.g. Dufty-Jones, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more critically nuanced study of rural mobilities, Dufty-Jones (2015) explores the politicisation of mobility in her study of the governmentality of public housing in rural Australia during the troubled decades of the 1980s and 1990s. In particular, she highlights the tensions between the aims of government housing, welfare and regional development policy in a period of rapid neoliberalisation, on the one hand, and the complex lived realities of rural individuals and households, on the other, many of whom were effectively ‘left behind’, in employment and economic citizenship terms, by wholesale retractions of private and public services from many rural communities.…”
Section: Mobilities and Migration: Rethinking Time Space And Geographical Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the ethnographic techniques were applied in conducting this research (see Kannisto, ). The study uses a case study approach following Dufty‐Jones' () indication of how limited case studies on rural mobility studies are. To collect data, the researcher conducted community visioning workshops in the study area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El ICT fue creado en 1939 para ejecutar funciones de construcción y financiación de vivienda de interés social (VIS); en 1991 se convirtió en el Instituto Nacional de Vivienda de Interés Social y Reforma Urbana (INURBE), cuya función principal era la adjudicación de subsidios para mejoramiento, construcción y adquisición de VIS. 3 Actualmente, la Caja de Vivienda Popular ejecuta políticas en programas de mejoramiento de barrios, de vivienda, titulación, urbanizaciones y reasentamientos urbanos, con que fue de suma importancia, por ejemplo, en la construcción de los proyectos de Ciudad Kennedy y Ciudad Bolívar, que albergan parte significativa de la población capitalina (Jaramillo, 1992). Hacia 1982 nació la preocupación por las llamadas viviendas de interés social (VIS).…”
Section: Antecedentes De La Política De Vivienda Y El Sector Financieunclassified