Government support and firm innovation performance in Chinese science and technology parks: The perspective of firm and sub‐park heterogeneity

Abstract

Science and technology parks (STPs) are established to promote the firm innovation performance via agglomeration economy and government support in China. On-site qualified firms obtain government R&D funding as a type of government support, and they are offered differential innovation service caused by the differential capabilities of subparks which scatter throughout a single city. It is debatable whether those government supports at firm and sub-park levels can promote firm innovation capabilities. This study takes Zhangjiang National Innovation Demonstration Zone, Shanghai as an example. It applies a Tobit regression model to analyse the databases of Zhangjiang Annual Sampling Survey of Firms 2015 and Zhangjiang Development Report 2015. We find out at the firm level, government R&D funding has a significant and positive influence on firms' innovation, but government R&D funding generates a crowing-out effect the innovation performance of on-site firms with more R&D investment themselves. At the sub-park level, innovation service agencies of sub-parks do not exert an important role in influencing firms' innovation, and they even have negative moderating effects on the relationship 750 |

Distribution Patterns and Multilevel Factors of the Innovation Activities of China’s New Energy Vehicle Industry

“…Since there is a GDP competition among governors, local governments usually publish favorable policies to attract actors and encourage innovation, although those regions may not have advantages in innovation. A study result about Shanghai stands for this argument [40]. Researchers find that governments' R&D input could increase entities' innovation output, but there is a mismatching feature in it.…”

The Dynamic Value of China’s High-Tech Zones: Direct and Indirect Influence on Urban Ecological Innovation

“…Unlike the spontaneous agglomeration under the market mechanism seen in most countries, China's HTZs are traction agglomeration zones spearheaded by government policies and local development strategies. The combination of various preferential policies makes the HTZ a policy depression: attracting high-quality innovative talents and innovative capital [26]. On the one hand, the innovation activities of enterprises in the agglomeration zone benefit from special development policies (e.g., low land price and preferential taxes that are lower than those in the external THZs).…”

The effect of science and technology parks on tenant firms: a literature review

“…It has been found to have a positive effect on sales (Liberati et al, 2016), R&D efficiency (Yang & Lee, 2021) and number of university spin-offs within the park (Link & Scott, 2005). Its effect on patents is not clear, with both positive (Teng et al, 2020) and negative (Squicciarini, 2009) effects found. Albahari et al (2018) show park age has a non-linear effect on tenants' innovation performance, with firms in younger and older parks outperforming firms in medium-aged parks.…”