2016
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Government Patent Use’: A Legal Approach To Reducing Drug Spending

Abstract: The high cost of patent-protected brand-name drugs can strain budgets and curb the widespread use of new medicines. An example is the case of direct-acting antiviral drugs for the treatment of hepatitis C. While prices for these drugs have come down in recent months, they still create barriers to treatment. Additionally, prescribing restrictions imposed by insurers put patients at increased risk of medical complications and contribute to transmission of the hepatitis C virus. We propose that the federal govern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An initial pilot project within the Medicare drug market would allow for analysis of implementation across the broader Medicaid and commercial markets. While anticipating the usual rallying cry of pharmaceutical companies that doing so would discourage the investments that result in new drugs, we theorize that utilizing a companies would likely complain that the use of section 1498 interferes with their incentives to invest in innovation, but they point out that these incentives would remain robust if the government paid fair royalties sufficient to compensate the companies for research and development costs, adjusted for risk of failure and margin of error in calculations made by a court or agency [37]. There have also been calls for the Department of Veterans Affairs to invoke this law to address the funding shortfall that has resulted from the high demand for high cost hepatitis C antiviral drugs [37].…”
Section: A Population Health Threshold For Imposing Price Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…An initial pilot project within the Medicare drug market would allow for analysis of implementation across the broader Medicaid and commercial markets. While anticipating the usual rallying cry of pharmaceutical companies that doing so would discourage the investments that result in new drugs, we theorize that utilizing a companies would likely complain that the use of section 1498 interferes with their incentives to invest in innovation, but they point out that these incentives would remain robust if the government paid fair royalties sufficient to compensate the companies for research and development costs, adjusted for risk of failure and margin of error in calculations made by a court or agency [37]. There have also been calls for the Department of Veterans Affairs to invoke this law to address the funding shortfall that has resulted from the high demand for high cost hepatitis C antiviral drugs [37].…”
Section: A Population Health Threshold For Imposing Price Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…section 1498, accords the government the right to use patented inventions without permission with the requirement that the government pay the patent holder a "reasonable and entire compensation." Under the law patent holders can demand royalties but they cannot prevent the government from producing the medicine or allowing others, most likely generic drug manufacturers, from doing so [37]. While the government's authority to invoke the 'Government Patent Use' law is limited to federal use, it would cover Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Affairs health system, and the Department of Defense [37].…”
Section: The 'Government Patent Use' Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations