2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2005.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Government-aided participation in planning Singapore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phrase “consultative authoritarianism” hasalready been applied to the regimes in Singapore, Malaysia, and Vietnam (He & Warren, 2011; Rodan & Jayasuriya, 2007). For example, in preparation of the 2001 city development Concept Plan, the government of Singapore allowed for an extended period of public consultation, including focus groups, online feedback channels, public discussion forums, and an open dialogue with the Minister for National Development (Soh & Yuen, 2006). Even the Saudi regime—considered quite closed by most governance metrics—now boasts various online e-participation portals for the purpose of “enabling citizens to participate in making all decisions and in formulating all development plans at all Government Agencies for the welfare of the whole Community” (“Saudi e-Government National Portal,” n.d.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phrase “consultative authoritarianism” hasalready been applied to the regimes in Singapore, Malaysia, and Vietnam (He & Warren, 2011; Rodan & Jayasuriya, 2007). For example, in preparation of the 2001 city development Concept Plan, the government of Singapore allowed for an extended period of public consultation, including focus groups, online feedback channels, public discussion forums, and an open dialogue with the Minister for National Development (Soh & Yuen, 2006). Even the Saudi regime—considered quite closed by most governance metrics—now boasts various online e-participation portals for the purpose of “enabling citizens to participate in making all decisions and in formulating all development plans at all Government Agencies for the welfare of the whole Community” (“Saudi e-Government National Portal,” n.d.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singapore, despite being one of the most wired countries in Asia, is still characterized as having an underdeveloped and constrained civic society (Soh & Yuen, 2006). Still, in recent years, citizens of Singapore have actively utilized the Internet to voice their political opinions and organize public gatherings and protests (Skoric, Poor, Liao, & Tang, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was followed by Singapore’s Climate Action Plan: A Climate-Resilient Singapore, for a Sustainable Future (Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources and Ministry of National Development, 2016). While the Singaporean government has been relatively proactive, civil society is widely seen as ‘underdeveloped and constrained’ (Sadoway, 2013; Soh and Yuen, 2006). This is a result of the mode of governing and institutional apparatus of the Singapore government, often categorised as a ‘soft authoritarian state’ (Hobson, 2006), which has limited the scope of civil society through a process of depoliticisation (Francesch-Huidobro, 2008; Lee, 2010).…”
Section: Case Studies and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%