Governing the Healthy Body: Discourses of Leisure and Lifestyle within Australian Health Policy

Abstract

In the past 30 years there have been significant shifts in the way Australian public health policy has problematized the role of leisure, recreation and physical activity in relation to the WHO identification of lifestyle disease risks to individual and social wellbeing. This article offers a cultural analysis of the way discourses of leisure and healthy lifestyles have been produced through the governmental objectives of health policy and promotion aimed at the body (Foucault, 1991;Rose, 1999). Two campaigns (1970's Life be in it! and 1990's Active Australia) are examined in relation to the rationalities and ethics through which individuals are encouraged to govern their own healthy lifestyle practices in the name of freedom.

Differential access to health care and support? A qualitative analysis of how Australian smokers conceptualise and respond to stigma

“…Several argued that the harmful effects of smoking are well publicised and therefore smokers must take responsibility for their own behaviour. This, largely accepted, view in our data is consistent with neoliberal policies that allocate responsibility to individuals, thereby obscuring the influence of structural and contextual factors on individual health (Ayo, 2012;Fullagar, 2002;Lindsay, 2010). A choice-based argument has been identified previously in an analysis of smokers'…”

Faster, harder, longer, stronger – management at the threshold between work and private life: The case of work place health promotion

“…Whilst operating on a different level of abstraction, the paper has also aimed to contribute to the two Foucauldian strands of sociological studies, which it has made use of to develop its conceptual framework: On the one hand, the works of for instance Dean (1999), McNay (2009) and Rose (1999), which have developed Foucault's works on neoliberalism in relation to the evolution of post-disciplinary techniques such as precarious employments, audit mechanisms and quasi markets. On the other hand, the works of for instance Lakoff (2015), Fullagar (2002), Rose (2007) and Wahlberg and Rose (2015), which have developed Foucault's works in relation to issues of public health, healthcare and the government of specific health issues. While the first strand has shown how post-disciplinary techniques differ from older forms of discipline through their ways of encouraging individuals to turn their lives into flows of human capital in the market place, the second strand has shown how new public health programmes and new ways of organizing healthcare make health a matter of optimizing life in accord with the logic of enterprise.…”

“…As such, the study relates directly to the sociological research referred to above that studies health initiatives as exemplars of neoliberal governmentality and post-disciplinary regulation (see e.g. Fullagar 2002;Lakoff 2015;Villadsen and Wahlberg 2015). Yet, this research has primarily studied changes in the government of public health (e.g.…”

Cancer self-health programmes: an ethos for negotiating multiplicities of healthcare

“…In contrast to these potential critiques, however, there is also a growing literature that questions whether there are opportunities within some CAM modalities and selfhealth for the individual to move 'beyond' previously construed neoliberal boundaries that instigated the user's care for their health (Broom 2009b;Fullagar 2002;Kuhlmann 2009;Meurk et al 2013). That is, if the 'persistence of controversy is often not a natural consequence of imperfect knowledge but a political consequence of conflicting interests and structural apathies' (Proctor 1995: 8) within) could be tempered by the ethical difference these programmes make to the ways users understand their healthcare.…”