2018
DOI: 10.1177/0964663917749990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governing Migration from the Margins

Abstract: This special issue of Social and Legal Studies focuses on refugee and migration governance at the margins (methodologically and geographically), exploring contemporary and historical cases through various socio-legal perspectives (detention, deportation, extra-territoriality, human rights and citizenship law), and in various geographical contexts (Syria and Turkey,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On this point, it is worth highlighting the articulations and the discrepancies between legal and formal regulations on the one hand, and informal police measures on the other. As Cetta Mainwaring and Margaret Walton-Roberts have remarked, while migration scholarship "has tended to focus on formal laws as enacted by the sovereign states", there is a need to shift the attention to "the geopolitical margins of the state" (Mainwaring, Walton-Roberts, 2018: 2); and, in parallel to this, I suggest, we should reorient the analysis towards the margins of the formal law and jurisdiction, in order to investigate how administrative measures and local decrees are impact on migrant's lives and movements. If we consider the spatial strategies enforced by the police at the Italian-French border and at the Italian-Swiss one, these should be read as frantic attempts on the part of the states to regain control over migration movements, more than as a planned strategy of migration management.…”
Section: Containment Through Mobility At the Italian Frontiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this point, it is worth highlighting the articulations and the discrepancies between legal and formal regulations on the one hand, and informal police measures on the other. As Cetta Mainwaring and Margaret Walton-Roberts have remarked, while migration scholarship "has tended to focus on formal laws as enacted by the sovereign states", there is a need to shift the attention to "the geopolitical margins of the state" (Mainwaring, Walton-Roberts, 2018: 2); and, in parallel to this, I suggest, we should reorient the analysis towards the margins of the formal law and jurisdiction, in order to investigate how administrative measures and local decrees are impact on migrant's lives and movements. If we consider the spatial strategies enforced by the police at the Italian-French border and at the Italian-Swiss one, these should be read as frantic attempts on the part of the states to regain control over migration movements, more than as a planned strategy of migration management.…”
Section: Containment Through Mobility At the Italian Frontiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Territoriality and Status as Grounds for Demanding Rights States use territoriality as a means to delineate their jurisdiction. However, as critical scholars have shown, the territorial jurisdiction of states is largely socially constructed or, at the very least, highly contingent (Braverman et al 2014; Raustiala 2011; Agnew 2010; Elden 2013; Mainwaring and Walton-Roberts 2018). For example, religious sanctuaries or consulates in which the laws of the state do not apply have always compromised the integrity of state territories, and increasing globalization renders the territorial application of state laws contentious (Raustiala 2011; Thomaz 2018)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the contingent nature of state territoriality opens up opportunities for states to manipulate the territorial application of their laws and delineate their responsibility to uphold rights (Maillet et al 2018; Ballas 2022; Kelly 2006; Mainwaring and Walton-Roberts 2018). For example, states have the power to apply different classifications to the territories they rule—such as ‘occupied territories,’ ‘closed military zones,’ or ‘seam zones’—which allows them to apply the particular legal regime that best serves their purposes in any given moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation