Governing Infrastructure in the Age of the “Art of the Deal”: Logics of Governance and Scales of Visibility

Abstract

Many different types of organization provide public services or goods and build public works without being, strictly speaking, part of government. Such entities tend to be seen as more innovative than government proper, both because of their organizational autonomy and because they primarily use private‐law techniques (contracts, mainly) and lay claim to private sector credentials. This article examines the presumed correlation between moves towards greater public‐private hybridity in government and public sector innovation, using illustrative examples from Ontario and British Columbia, Canada. Combining interviews with professional infrastructure deal‐makers, direct observation of public infrastructure workshops, and analyses of the documents that constitute infrastructure deals, we show that the quest to bring virtues and techniques associated with private enterprise to the delivery and governance of public goods and services often leads to a dialectical reversal. At first, bureaucratic rules do give way to the pursuit of more or less sui generis deals. But the entities that initiate deals and partnerships soon come to feel the need to standardize the process, which then leads to the return of standard templates and surprisingly rigid rules.

Learning Like a State: Statecraft in the Digital Age

“…Anyone with a working internet connection can interact with it through a computer or mobile interface. The proliferation of public-facing government websites and platforms also creates a feeling that the state's actions should be more easily knowable, if only by establishing an aesthetics of transparency (Valverde, Johns, and Raso 2018). So-called "open data" initiatives, whereby state agencies make a profusion of information available online in machinereadable format, are often implemented in the name of transparency and accountability (for example, see Björklund [2016] on e-government in Estonia).…”

Infrastructures and Laws: Publics and Publicness

“…Infrastructure studies and legal studies have not been closely connected in the academy, even while infrastructure and law have much to do with each other in practice. An increasing number of topical works traverse both terrains (e.g., Hilgartner 2017), but more systematic investigations of how infrastructure and law come together or mutually illuminate are only recently expanding (e.g., Donaldson & Kingsbury 2013a, Eslava 2015, Kingsbury 2019, Mallard 2014, Valverde et al 2018. This article connects a major strand of normative political and legal theory on publics and publicness, with recent work on infrastructural publics (Collier et al 2016, Korn et al 2019a).…”

Smooth Operators, Predictable Glitches: The Interface Governance of Benefits and Borders

“…It exists on personal computers in our homes and in rural data servers (2020, 83). In theory, the digitalization of government agencies suggests that state actions should be more easily knowable or accessible, although this impression may be generated by an aesthetics of transparency rather than by truly transparent procedures (Valverde et al 2018). The digitalization, or digital interfacing, of government is an international phenomenon.…”