Governing climate change: polycentricity in action?

Tobin, Paul

doi:10.1080/03003930.2019.1620523

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 412 publications

(561 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on the reports above, it appears that countries in the Global South face similar challenges when combatting climate change at the local level. As many countries in Africa and others in the Global South grapple with problems associated with climate change, local authorities will continue to be seen as key drivers in mitigating and adapting societies to ecological changes (Armstrong, 2023;Tobin, 2019). In Zambia, the debate on the role of local authorities in ecological governance has not gained prominence among academics.…”

Section: Decentralising Climate Governance: a Global South Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Decentralising Climate Governance in the Global South: Lessons from Itezhi-Tezhi and the Kafue Wetlands, Zambia

Ndambwa,

Moonga

2024

jcgpp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses the challenges of decentralising climate governance in the Global South in the context of intensifying climate change. Using qualitative methods of data collection and analysis, we interviewed a total of 112 participants who participated in the study, including traditional leaders, ward councillors, subject-matter experts, government officials and members of the public who took part in focus group discussions. Our results show that devolution, delegation, deconcentration and privatisation have been used as strategies for decentralising climate action in the Itezhi-Tezhi District. However, these methods of decentralisation are affected by several factors, including unclear rules for elected and appointed leaders, which influence the devolution of decision-making responsibilities at the local government level. Regarding delegation, decentralising climate governance is affected by inadequate public participation, particularly in the design and execution of climate initiatives in the Kafue wetlands. Furthermore, this article shows that deconcentration is likely to affect climate governance because the national government has not deconcentrated the units for climate governance from the line ministry to the local authority. Privatisation, which has been an effective way of decentralising climate governance in the Kafue wetlands, has also been problematic due to inadequate community participation. These challenges and opportunities serve as lessons for building resilience in effective decentralised climate governance in the Kafue wetlands. This article adds to the ongoing discourse on the efficacy of decentralising climate governance in the Global South and offers valuable insights for future research in this genre of academic inquiry in Sub-Saharan Africa.

show abstract

Section: Decentralising Climate Governance: a Global South Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%