Governing buyer–supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China

Abstract

Building on economic and social exchange theories, this study investigates the different roles transactional and relational mechanisms have in hindering opportunism and improving relationship performance in an emerging economy. Our study applied to manufacturer–distributor dyads in China and used matched survey data (225 paired sample firms) to test our hypotheses. Our hierarchical multivariate regression and semipartial correlation analyses suggest that transactional mechanisms are more effective in restraining opportunism while relational mechanisms are more powerful in improving relationship performance. This performance is improved more significantly when both contracts and relational norms are used jointly than when used separately. Likewise, opportunism is curbed more effectively when both contracts and trust are used jointly than when used individually.

Piggy in the Middle: How Direct Customer Power Affects First-Tier Suppliers’ Adoption of Socially Responsible Procurement Practices and Performance

“…Studies show that non-mediated power use leads companies to adopt relationship-based practices, such as the use of trust and relational norms, in managing the relationship (Liu et al 2009). Moreover, the use of non-mediated power is much more likely to induce the supplier to adapt to a buyer's wishes (Nyaga et al 2013).…”

Governance Mechanisms for Green Supply Chain Partnership

“…Similar to problem-solving cooperation governance, the level of information interactions engaged in by buyers and suppliers is likely to increase with dedicated investments from the supplier [18,26,28,29]. In particular, with specific investments, both parties would like to communicate to ensure the function of the dedicated assets and safeguard such specialized investments from costly termination.…”

“…Environmental uncertainty is pervasive in all supply chain activities and has important effects on supplier governance and buyer performance [23]. These uncertainties induce challenges to manufacturing operations and increase supplier performance ambiguity and exchange hazards, which, in turn, reduces plant efficiency and environmental performance [18].…”

Relationship Between Supply Chain Risks An Empirical Work

“…These tools have guided the decision makers. Analytical hierarchy process (e.g., [19]), multi-stage influence diagram (e.g., [20]), Monte Carlo approach (e.g., [21]), interpretive structural modelling (e.g., [22]), partial least square method (e.g., [23]) and several other methods have been utilized by academics to test models for supply chain risk assessment.…”