2012
DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2011.599928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governance Role of Auditors and Legal Environment: Evidence from Corporate Disclosure Transparency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings reveal that corruption is deeply rooted in Bangladesh's society. Similar to Hofstede, Hofstede, and Minkov's (2010) culture index, the World Bank's (2010) Governance Indicators Data and La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer, and Vishny's (1998) data [see also Leuz, Nanda, & Wysocki, 2003;Han, Kang, & Yoo, 2012], this study finds lower rates of enforcement in Bangladesh compared with India and Pakistan. This is due to higher levels of corruption, a factor which weakens the enforcement of laws and is marked by a secretive culture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings reveal that corruption is deeply rooted in Bangladesh's society. Similar to Hofstede, Hofstede, and Minkov's (2010) culture index, the World Bank's (2010) Governance Indicators Data and La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer, and Vishny's (1998) data [see also Leuz, Nanda, & Wysocki, 2003;Han, Kang, & Yoo, 2012], this study finds lower rates of enforcement in Bangladesh compared with India and Pakistan. This is due to higher levels of corruption, a factor which weakens the enforcement of laws and is marked by a secretive culture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Hence, company managements are less likely to pursue a high level of IFRS compliance. Moreover, using the World Bank's Governance Indicators Data (2010) and data from La Porta et al (1998) [see also Leuz et al (2003) and Han et al (2012)], the present study reveals a lower rate of enforcement in Bangladesh compared with India and Pakistan. This is due to higher levels of corruption, a factor which weakens law enforcement.…”
Section: Conclusion Implications and Scope For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…With respect to board size, theoretically, increased managerial monitoring associated with larger boards can have a positive influence on corporate disclosures, including CG ones and performance (Jensen, 1993;Jensen & Meckling, 1976). In a similar vein, and with respect to audit firm, larger audit firms have greater financial strength, knowledge, and independence, which can affect positively on voluntary CG disclosure (DeAngelo, 1981;Eng & Mak, 2003;Han et al, 2012;Owusu-Ansah, 1998). Economically, the implications of these findings can be quantified as, a one standard deviation change (increase) in BSZ, AFZ, and CGC may be associated with about 0.40% (1.76 × 0.231), 12.45% (49% × 0.254) and 9.66% (30% × 0.322) change (increase) in the level of the SCGI, respectively.…”
Section: Empirical Results From Multivariate Regression Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appointment of external auditors to examine company accounts is an important governance mechanism for monitoring managers to reduce agency conflicts in modern corporations, whereby ownership is separate from control (Haniffa & Hudaib, 2007;Han, Kang, & Yoo, 2012). One way of determining external auditor quality is the level of disclosure, and in fact, audit firm size has been suggested to have a positive effect on corporate disclosure (Eng & Mak, 2003;Owusu-Ansah, 1998) and audit quality (DeAngelo, 1981).…”
Section: Hypothesis 4 (H4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the"agency and stakeholder theories, audit firms are able to influence the level and and quality of their corporate governance disclosure (Barako et al, 2006). Such firms are considered to be external corporate governance mechanisms that oversee management activities through the firm's financial performance and disclosures (Kang & Yoo, 2012). Evidence points to the fact that large-sized audit firms (big 4) adopt superior auditing performance standards compared to their small audit counterparts (Schiehll, Terra, & Victor, 2013).…”
Section: Proportion Of Independent Directors and Voluntary Corporate mentioning
confidence: 99%