2018
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2018.1487053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governance Interventions in Conflict-Affected Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be noted, however, that at least part of the explanation for higher EQ-5D scores in 2014 than in 2018 may be the presence of genuinely better HRQoL on average for the study population in the former year. There is evidence that people exposed to long-term conflicts develop coping mechanisms to adapt to everyday routine in violent areas, in addition to benefitting in some cases from governance arrangements and networks sponsored by armed groups (including the provision by armed actors of some level of healthcare to the community, as it was the case with the FARC in Meta and other Colombian regions) [33,34]. The implementation of the Colombian peace accord was not accompanied immediately by an increased presence of the State in conflict-affected areas, likely leading to disrupted coping mechanisms and networks amid a vacuum of authority and public service provision, as it has been observed in other conflict settings [35], which in turn might have harmed people's HRQoL in conflict-affected areas shortly after the peace accord.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be noted, however, that at least part of the explanation for higher EQ-5D scores in 2014 than in 2018 may be the presence of genuinely better HRQoL on average for the study population in the former year. There is evidence that people exposed to long-term conflicts develop coping mechanisms to adapt to everyday routine in violent areas, in addition to benefitting in some cases from governance arrangements and networks sponsored by armed groups (including the provision by armed actors of some level of healthcare to the community, as it was the case with the FARC in Meta and other Colombian regions) [33,34]. The implementation of the Colombian peace accord was not accompanied immediately by an increased presence of the State in conflict-affected areas, likely leading to disrupted coping mechanisms and networks amid a vacuum of authority and public service provision, as it has been observed in other conflict settings [35], which in turn might have harmed people's HRQoL in conflict-affected areas shortly after the peace accord.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the Colombian results point to the need for some caution about current policy agendas that target aid to post-conflict communities in the hope of strengthening local institutions, governance, and social cohesion (Mansuri and Rao 2012). If the type of institutional capture we observe in Colombia is also present in other countries, post-conflict community-level interventions may well reinforce war dynamics and the power of armed groups and their allies, thereby creating potential sparks for conflict reignition (Crost et al 2014;Justino 2019). Communities that benefit from resistance-type processes during wartime may experience more positive results from these policy interventions, though much more research is needed to document such cases and the implications of different equilibria proposed by the model for state-building and development processes in the long term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Yendi crisis reveals that local organizations that favour illegal and destructive conduct will entrench dysfunctional economic, social and political interactions. Further, the Yendi conflict proves that groups that encourage the rule of law, impose proper norms of behaviour and impose sanctions for undesirable conduct during and after conflict can improve the living conditions of families under their control (Justino, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%