Governance in the Age of Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities for South and Southeast Asia

Public Trust in the Perspective of the Role of Actors: What, Why, and How to Improve Public Security and Order

“…According to some experts [1], [41] another reason underlying the importance and interest of Bhabinkamtibmas's efforts to actualize the concept of public trust is due to the increasing attention from public administration observers and experts, especially adherents of the contemporary paradigm, New Public Governance (NPG) which was inspired by the monumental work of Peters & Osborne [62] in the book The New Public Governance and popularized by Farazmand [63], [64] in his writing Sound Governance. The core ideas of [62], which many experts and advocating researchers refer to, state that public trust is an important part of the dimensions of policy networks and network-based governance that are being developed at present and in the future.…”

“…According to Akib [59][60] whatever public trust learning strategy is chosen to be implemented, as is the strategic approach stated above, we are all in the era of capability [24] or the era of virtual governance in the context of New Public Governance (NPG) or sound governance (SG) by Farazmand [63], [64]. In the context of this NPG, artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence/AI) transforms big data in all aspects of organizational life and the Internet of Things into a new necessity and wisdom dedicated to increasing the competence of actors/stakeholders in opening up space and opportunities to create public trust in public institutions or organizations that facilitate, including Bhabinkamtibmas as actors in creating security, order and obedience in society.…”

Challenges of Contextualizing Tenure Track System in a New Professional University in Pakistan: Context, Content, Implementation and Outcomes

“…There was a need for a paradigm shift from instruction to learning, making their students develop professionally and meet the challenges of the global workplace and their developing country's needs. Farazmand (2004) proposed considering three approaches-top-down or elitist, bottomup or participative, and institutional or cultural-in explaining reforms in the South Asian context. The reforms in South Asia have been elitist and served to uphold the interests of the country's dominant political and bureaucratic elite.…”