2014
DOI: 10.1504/ijesb.2014.057913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governance in small firms - a country comparison of current practices

Abstract: This study investigates the practice of governance in small firms and shows differences between these firms in the principality of Liechtenstein and Scotland. Thereby, the study's intention is to draw particular attention to the influence of corporate governance on the firm's ability to change. Thus a broader scope of corporate governance, which is normally discussed from a control perspective, is taken. Using data from semi-structured interviews with 20 managing directors of small firms, the findings showed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean ranks of U Mann-Whitney test indicate that the German SMEs were distinguished by a higher corporate governance score, in comparison to Polish SMEs. The constituents of the corporate governance score clearly indicate that this is driven primarily by succession plans (CG.succ) and qualification and competences of the management team (CG.dcr) which is in line with the findings from the international literature (Crossan and Henschel 2012;Crossan et al 2018;Durst and Henschel 2014). For these constituents the differences between German and Polish SMEs are statistically significant at 0.1%.…”
Section: Exploration Of Similarities and Differences Between Germany ...supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean ranks of U Mann-Whitney test indicate that the German SMEs were distinguished by a higher corporate governance score, in comparison to Polish SMEs. The constituents of the corporate governance score clearly indicate that this is driven primarily by succession plans (CG.succ) and qualification and competences of the management team (CG.dcr) which is in line with the findings from the international literature (Crossan and Henschel 2012;Crossan et al 2018;Durst and Henschel 2014). For these constituents the differences between German and Polish SMEs are statistically significant at 0.1%.…”
Section: Exploration Of Similarities and Differences Between Germany ...supporting
confidence: 85%
“…These questions are presented in detail in Table 3. The first set of questions outlined in Table 3 is concerned with the SMEs' strategic thinking process and its succession regulations (Durst and Henschel 2014). The corporate governance strategic thinking is covered with two questions that refer to long-term and thus strategic thinking.…”
Section: Cimmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the resolution stage, nearly all firms were engaged in innovating their technical infrastructure. The innovating activities cover things such as the implementation of a knowledge management system, improvements in the management and cost accounting system, introducing formal project management, and the implementation of new enterprise resource planning systems and better governance and oversight structures (Durst and Henschel, 2014). It was also interesting to note that SCO2, GER2 and SWE2 see a high need for developing and testing their crisis management plans based on the experienced crisis events and measures taken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wells and Mueller (2014) find that employees are not seen as a source of missing and needed skills and characteristics for governance, but that independence is essential for directors to provide sufficient monitoring and assist with changing and volatile responsibilities and environments. Durst and Henschel (2014), however, find that some SMEs rely heavily on their employees for strategic opinions.…”
Section: Evidence Of Alternative Governance In the Broader Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%