2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gouge formation by dynamic pulverization during earthquake rupture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
145
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implications for the amount of fracture energy and type of stress field required to have produced the observed damage are significant, as the inferred energy depends strongly on the grain size distribution, and the existence of very small grains may imply tensile stress (e.g., RECHES and DEWERS, 2005;SAMMIS and BEN-ZION, 2008). Rather than C 50% of the earthquake energy budget being consumed by dynamic fracturing and pulverization as suggested by WILSON et al, (2005), we find that the average value is closer to 1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The implications for the amount of fracture energy and type of stress field required to have produced the observed damage are significant, as the inferred energy depends strongly on the grain size distribution, and the existence of very small grains may imply tensile stress (e.g., RECHES and DEWERS, 2005;SAMMIS and BEN-ZION, 2008). Rather than C 50% of the earthquake energy budget being consumed by dynamic fracturing and pulverization as suggested by WILSON et al, (2005), we find that the average value is closer to 1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Other parameters governing the inelastic response of the model are the same: crushing pressure p c = 300 MPa, M = 1.5, # = 0.5 Ä 0.99. The higher values of # indicates a substantial ''distance'' between the initial and ultimate gsd's, as experimentally observed in RECHES and DEWERS (2005). The breakage energy is higher than the frictional dissipation when u is below a critical value u c determined as follows.…”
Section: Numerical Approach To the Earthquake Energy Balancementioning
confidence: 77%
“…The stability of fault gouges holds the key to understanding earthquake dynamics (e.g., MARONE et al, 1990;SCHOLZ, 1990;BEN-ZION and SAMMIS, 2003), and the associated release of energy (e.g., SLEEP and BLANPIED, 1992;RECHES and DEWERS, 2005). Fault gouges evolve in high pressure or even ultrahigh-pressure environments of cataclasis (e.g., MORROW et al, 1981;LUND and AUSTRHEIM, 2003), commonly because of the severe motion of the lithospheric plate boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using geological constraints, it was argued that the Punchbowl fault was exhumed from between 2 and 4 km depth, and that the thin continuous slip surface observed in exposures of the Punchbowl fault core accommodated at least 1.5 km of offset, with little or no mixing between opposing wall rock materials (CHESTER and CHESTER, 1998). More recently, in-situ ''pulverization'' of rock and gouge has been proposed as a potential indicator of seismic rupture velocities (RECHES and DEWERS, 2005;DOR et al 2006;SAMMIS and BEN-ZION, 2008), and localized ''fluidization'' of fault rock materials has been recognized in the slip zones of exhumed faults cutting layered volcanic sequences (SAGY andBRODSKY, 2009), in melanges (MENEGHINI et al, 2010;ROWE et al, 2005;UJIIE et al, 2007), and in the clayrich slip zones of the Nojima fault (M W 7. 2 1995Kobe earthquake, OTSUKI et al, 2003 and the Chelengpu fault (M W 7.6 1999Chi-Chi earthquake, BOULLIER et al, 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%