2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1470542714000233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gothic possessives, adjectives, and other modifiers in-ata

Abstract: The paradigm of some possessive pronouns, adjectives, and some other modifiers in Gothic contains an instance of morphological variation in the neuter nominative and accusative singular, where the bare stem of the modifier alternates with the pronominally inflected form in -ata (for example, jugg versus juggata ‘young’). In an effort to account for this morphological variation, this paper examines the evidence for the competition between the bare stem and inflected forms in -ata attested in the Gothic New Test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The alternative view posits that the "strong" endings were simply transferred from the pronominal declension to the adjectives, possibly by lexical diffusion (cf. Ratkus 2015). A conciliatory approach appears in Prokosch (1939: 261): on one hand, in stressing the parallelism with Baltic and Slavic pronominalised adjectives, he claims that the "strong" declension adds pronominal elements; on the other hand, he describes the resulting endings as having transferred from the pronominal declension.…”
Section: Germanicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative view posits that the "strong" endings were simply transferred from the pronominal declension to the adjectives, possibly by lexical diffusion (cf. Ratkus 2015). A conciliatory approach appears in Prokosch (1939: 261): on one hand, in stressing the parallelism with Baltic and Slavic pronominalised adjectives, he claims that the "strong" declension adds pronominal elements; on the other hand, he describes the resulting endings as having transferred from the pronominal declension.…”
Section: Germanicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of uns in the Lord's Prayer may be due to the wish to make it more colloquial and intimate." In my own study of the competition between the bare-stem and -ata forms of singular nominative and accusative neuter possessives pronouns, adjectives and other modifiers (Ratkus 2015), I conclude that modifiers augmented with -ata were stylistically charged forms invoked in contexts of second-person address or contexts that warranted an elevated or reverential tone. The availability of these variant forms enabled the Gothic translators to imbue the Gothic text with contextual stylistic nuances or contrasts that were unavailable in the original Greek (and Latin).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%