2014
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3001-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GoSam-2.0: a tool for automated one-loop calculations within the Standard Model and beyond

Abstract: We present the version 2.0 of the program package GoSam for the automated calculation of one-loop amplitudes. GoSam is devised to compute one-loop QCD and/or electroweak corrections to multi-particle processes within and beyond the Standard Model. The new code contains improvements in the generation and in the reduction of the amplitudes, performs better in computing time and numerical accuracy, and has an extended range of applicability. The extended version of the "Binoth-Les-Houches-Accord" interface to Mon… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
256
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
(274 reference statements)
0
256
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main technical challenge to obtaining results at NNLL accuracy is thus the calculation of the hard function to NLO, which unlike the soft function and soft anomalous dimension is process dependent. We carry out this calculation for the first time here, using a modified version of the one-loop providers GoSam [26,27], Openloops [28] and MadLoop [29]. Our result thus adds to the growing literature on hard functions for 2 → 3 processes, i.e.…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)124mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main technical challenge to obtaining results at NNLL accuracy is thus the calculation of the hard function to NLO, which unlike the soft function and soft anomalous dimension is process dependent. We carry out this calculation for the first time here, using a modified version of the one-loop providers GoSam [26,27], Openloops [28] and MadLoop [29]. Our result thus adds to the growing literature on hard functions for 2 → 3 processes, i.e.…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)124mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Most of these tools are publicly available and many rely on reduction techniques operating at the integrand level, such as the Ossola-Papadopoulos-Pittau method [35]. For this reason we decided to carry out the calculation of the NLO hard function with three of these tools: GoSam [26,27], MadLoop [29] and Openloops [28]. All of these tools required a certain level of customization in order to make the calculation of the hard function possible.…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)124mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use MadLoop/aMC@NLO [33] and GoSam [34] to generate the matrix elements of triple-Higgs production via gluon fusion. Then we use the VBFNLO code [35][36][37] to perform the phase space integration, where we set the parton distribution functions (PDFs) as CTEQ6L1 [38].…”
Section: The MC Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, 2 → 4 processes at next-to-leading order (NLO) are state of the art [1][2][3][4][5], and even higher multiplicities are affordable [6]. Several tools for the automated calculation of NLO differential cross sections are available [7,8], including the merging with parton showers [9]. There has been also a lot of advances in next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) calculations [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%