2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-022-02707-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GoPeaks: histone modification peak calling for CUT&Tag

Abstract: Genome-wide mapping of histone modifications is critical to understanding transcriptional regulation. CUT&Tag is a new method for profiling histone modifications, offering improved sensitivity and decreased cost compared with ChIP-seq. Here, we present GoPeaks, a peak calling method specifically designed for histone modification CUT&Tag data. We compare the performance of GoPeaks against commonly used peak calling algorithms to detect histone modifications that display a range of peak profiles and are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TMM (Trimmed Mean of M-Values) normalization was performed on histone mark samples to accurately account for differences in library composition and sequencing depth. First, peaks were called on control samples against IgG using GoPeaks ( Yashar et al, 2022 ). featureCounts ( Liao et al, 2014 ) was then used to count reads from each replicate inside the peaks for each histone mark across control and fru -/- samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMM (Trimmed Mean of M-Values) normalization was performed on histone mark samples to accurately account for differences in library composition and sequencing depth. First, peaks were called on control samples against IgG using GoPeaks ( Yashar et al, 2022 ). featureCounts ( Liao et al, 2014 ) was then used to count reads from each replicate inside the peaks for each histone mark across control and fru -/- samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CUT&Tag and CUT&RUN libraries were aligned to the human genome (hg38) using Bow-tie2 and the following options --local --very-sensitive-local --no-unal --no-mixed --no-dis- cordant --phred33 -I 10 -X 700 (60). Peaks were called using GoPeaks and the following option -mdist 1000 (61). High confidence peaks were defined by presence in 2/2 or 2/3 replicates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR duplicates were removed from the sorted bam files using Picard tools (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). The filtered reads were then employed to identify CUT&Tag peaks using MACS2 (81). The overlapped peaks in the two biological replicates were identified by the Irreproducibility Discovery Rate (IDR) (82).…”
Section: Cutandtag and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%