2013
DOI: 10.1002/hast.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Googling a Patient

Abstract: The twenty‐six‐year‐old patient requested a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction because of an extensive family history of cancer. She reported that she had developed melanoma at twenty‐five; that her mother, sister, aunts, and a cousin all had breast cancer; that a cousin had ovarian cancer at nineteen; and that a brother was treated for esophageal cancer at fifteen. The treating team was skeptical about this history, and they could find no documentation of the patient's reported melanoma. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This concordance was unexpected because a national consensus on this topic has yet to develop. 9,19,[22][23][24][25] It may be explained by the observation that all students, as well as many of the faculty, had previously completed the same course in clinical ethics that emphasizes patient autonomy and privacy. A curriculum to train students on appropriate use of SNS should include a discussion of this topic with a review of potential risks and benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This concordance was unexpected because a national consensus on this topic has yet to develop. 9,19,[22][23][24][25] It may be explained by the observation that all students, as well as many of the faculty, had previously completed the same course in clinical ethics that emphasizes patient autonomy and privacy. A curriculum to train students on appropriate use of SNS should include a discussion of this topic with a review of potential risks and benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Currently, patients expect that what they share with a physician is the sum total of the doctor's information about them. It has been argued that such online research about patients should be avoided, unless there is a significant health or safety issue at stake [23].…”
Section: Case Study Five: Patient Targeted Googling [21]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the side of patients, reservation is mainly due to protection of privacy and the control over personal data. Especially initiatives to mine individuals' healthcare data -even in aggregated and anonymised forms -are met with strong opposition as recently experienced by the care.data project in the United Kingdom (see also Volpe et al, 2013). 41 Initiatives to improve patients' control over data re-use are underway, e.g.…”
Section: Healthcare Service Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%